2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04345.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthetic NCAM‐derived peptide, FGL, protects hippocampal neurons from ischemic insult both in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: There is a major unmet need for development of innovative strategies for neuroprotection against ischemic brain injury. Here we show that FGL, a neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM)-derived peptide binding to and inducing phosphorylation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), acts neuroprotectively after an ischemic insult both in vitro and in vivo. The neuroprotective activity of FGL was tested in vitro on dissociated rat hippocampal neurons and hippocampal slice cultures, using a protocol of oxygen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be interpreted as a loss of input specificity, one of the basic properties of LTP that made it originally suitable as a model for memory mechanisms, which would then imply that FGL may not engender only beneficial effects. Another possibility, more in line with the positive effects of FGL on memory (Cambon et al 2004;Skibo et al 2005;Secher et al 2006Secher et al , 2009Klementiev et al 2007), is that the apparent "heterosynaptic" LTP reflects, in fact, a facilitation of processes homosynaptic in nature, in the same way as it has been suggested for the requirement of homosynatic activity in heterosynaptic LTD (Abraham et al 2007). Indeed, stimulation of the FGFR-1 with FGF, NCAM or L1 has been shown to induce a rise in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca 2+ ]i) mediated by the activation of L-and T-type voltagedependent calcium channels (VDCC) in neural as well as non-neural cell cultures (Archer et al 1999;Rosenthal et al 2005;Kiryushko et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be interpreted as a loss of input specificity, one of the basic properties of LTP that made it originally suitable as a model for memory mechanisms, which would then imply that FGL may not engender only beneficial effects. Another possibility, more in line with the positive effects of FGL on memory (Cambon et al 2004;Skibo et al 2005;Secher et al 2006Secher et al , 2009Klementiev et al 2007), is that the apparent "heterosynaptic" LTP reflects, in fact, a facilitation of processes homosynaptic in nature, in the same way as it has been suggested for the requirement of homosynatic activity in heterosynaptic LTD (Abraham et al 2007). Indeed, stimulation of the FGFR-1 with FGF, NCAM or L1 has been shown to induce a rise in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca 2+ ]i) mediated by the activation of L-and T-type voltagedependent calcium channels (VDCC) in neural as well as non-neural cell cultures (Archer et al 1999;Rosenthal et al 2005;Kiryushko et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In vivo, chronic administration of the peptide improves associative, spatial as well as social memory, and reduces phencyclidine-induced impairment in spatial learning (Cambon et al 2004;Secher et al 2006Secher et al , 2009. Remarkably, a single acute administration of FGL appears sufficient to alleviate Ab, or ischemia-induced neuropathology and cognitive impairment (Skibo et al 2005;Klementiev et al 2007;Secher et al 2009). Further, a recent study by Stewart and colleagues demonstrated that FGL treatment alters spine morphology and synapse distribution (Stewart et al 2010).…”
Section: [Supplemental Materials Is Available For This Article]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 FGL proved to exert beneficial effects in different models of neurological or psychiatric diseases. 6,7,[11][12][13][14]20 In the present study, repeated administration of the peptide mimetic FGL affected kindling progression as well as associated alterations in the number of neuronal progenitor cells and early postmitotic cells. The impact of FGL on kindling progression is indicated by a reduced number of stimulations necessary to induce a generalized seizure.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…5 Neuroprotective effects have been observed in vitro using a model of oxygen−glucose deprivation as well as in vivo in a gerbil transient global ischemia model. 7 Moreover, FGL affected long-term plasticity, synapse and dendritic spine structure, and synaptogenesis. 8−10 Beneficial effects were also reported from a mouse aging model, a chronic stress model, and an Alzheimer's model indicating neuroprotective and cognition-enhancing properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enhances hippocampal function (Cambon et al, 2004, Dallerac et al, 2011 and plays a role in neuronal development (Cambon et al, 2004, Li et al, 2009, Dallerac et al, 2011. FGL has also been shown to be protective against 6-hydroxydopamine and amyloid-β (Aβ) in vitro (Neiiendam et al, 2004) and decreases neuronal damage in hippocampal organotypic slice cultures subjected to oxygen-glucose (Skibo et al, 2005). Protective effects of FGL in vivo have also been reported; thus it has been shown to attenuate the increased Aβ-immunoreactivity and deficit in cognitive function induced by intracerebroventricular administration of pre-aggregated Aβ [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] (Klementiev et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%