2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthetic dinuclear copper(II) hydrolase and its potential as antitumoral: Cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and DNA cleavage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vitro assay of the nuclease activity uses supercoiled plasmid DNA (FI) as a substrate. Single-strand cleavage by CCS results in an open circular DNA (FII), while cleavage involving two DNA strands results in the linear form (FIII) (Rey et al, 2009). Decreased FI and concomitant intensification of FII and FIII forms indicates a dose-dependent cleavage of plasmid DNA by CCS at 0.78-3.12 mg/mL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The in vitro assay of the nuclease activity uses supercoiled plasmid DNA (FI) as a substrate. Single-strand cleavage by CCS results in an open circular DNA (FII), while cleavage involving two DNA strands results in the linear form (FIII) (Rey et al, 2009). Decreased FI and concomitant intensification of FII and FIII forms indicates a dose-dependent cleavage of plasmid DNA by CCS at 0.78-3.12 mg/mL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This DNA interaction may involve intercalation between base pairs, and cleavage of the DNA molecule, and may be a significant antitumor mechanism of new compounds (Rey et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the cytotoxicity efficiency of the Cr(III) and Ru(III) complexes is comparable with that of the standard drug, cis-platin, while the Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) complexes showed lower anticancer activities when compared to that of the ligand. The cytotoxicity of metal complexes is depending on their ability to bind DNA and damage its structure resulting in the impairment of its function, which is followed by replication and transcription processes inhibition and eventually cell death that is what we can suppose [22][23][24][25][26]. Thus, the relatively higher cytotoxicity exhibited by the Cr(III) and Ru(III) complexes may be due to the relatively stronger binding ability of the complexes with DNA as shown in the DNA binding studies.…”
Section: Structure Of the Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is corroborated by the absence of NC form increase, indicating that the cleavage occurs through double-strand breaks instead of single strand. Thus, one might consider that ZM5 shows the capability to promote double-strand breaks [29][30][31][32]. We then evalu- It is often accepted that Cu(II) complexes are capable to cleave DNA by hydrolytic mechanisms, but these compounds have also been reported to generate ROS in presence of a reductant and dioxygen to induce oxidative cleavage of DNA [26,33].…”
Section: Effect Of Zm5 On Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%