2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Synthetic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Single Components and Packages in Creativity Training Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
113
3
22

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
9
113
3
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confirm the findings of previous meta-analysis (Ma, 2006;Rose & Lin, 1984;Scott et al, 2004) indicating that creativity training is effective (d = 0.81, r = 0.35) on adults. The magnitude of this finding indicates creativity training is promising for increasing adults' creative thinking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results confirm the findings of previous meta-analysis (Ma, 2006;Rose & Lin, 1984;Scott et al, 2004) indicating that creativity training is effective (d = 0.81, r = 0.35) on adults. The magnitude of this finding indicates creativity training is promising for increasing adults' creative thinking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They also observed that the most successful creativity training models are grounded in the procedure for the generation of new ideas, specifically problem finding and conceptual combination, which concerns the application of cognitive capacities. More recently, Ma's (2006) meta-analysis of creativity training on 34 studies revealed a large effect size (grand mean effect size 0.77), which further confirmed Torrance's (1972a) initial investigation. Moreover, it showed older adults had more successful training effects than younger ones.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Esta pesquisa corrobora resultados de investigações anteriores cujas evidências apontam para os efeitos positivos de programas de criatividade (Ma, 2006;Nakano, 2011;Rose & Lin, 1984;Scott, Leritz, & Mumford, 2004), especialmente no que diz respeito à promoção de habilidades criativas. Entre as limitações do estudo, salientam-se a seleção da amostra de conveniência e o uso de dois instrumentos (Teste Torrance do Pensamento Criativo e Escala sobre Clima para a Criatividade em Sala de Aula) que não foram validados para a faixa etária ou ano escolar dos discentes participantes da pesquisa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Técnicas e materiais instrucionais foram desenvolvidos para facilitar a expressão da criatividade no ambiente escolar. Como consequência, vários estudos foram realizados com vistas a avaliar os efeitos de intervenções em criatividade (Ma, 2006;Nakano, 2011;Rose & Lin, 1984;Scott, Leritz, & Mumford, 2004). Os resultados revelam um impacto positivo, apoiando a premissa de que é possível ensinar a pessoa a pensar criativamente.…”
unclassified
“…It is essential that the 21st century engineer is creative and innovative in order to solve the problems of the future 1 , and these skills can be taught and nurtured [2][3][4] . This can be a challenge due to lack of resources and limited time available in engineering curriculums.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%