1967
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1967.tb06888.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Synopsis of the Genera and Species of the Tribe Theleboleae (= Pseudoascoboleae)

Abstract: Examination of genera of the Pseudoascoboleae (Ascomycetes, Discomycetes, Ascobolaceae) revealed that many were polytypic. Characters presently used to distinguish these genera are considered to be artificial and true relationships cut across accepted generic lines. Of the genera treated, Thecotheus and parts of Ascophanus, since their asci blue in iodine and their spores bear callose‐pectic markings, are considered more closely related to the Pezizeae. Other genera are excluded from the Pseudoascoboleae becau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since I have included the Iodophaneae (to which Sphaerosoma belongs) as a tribe of the Ascobolaceae in this classification, a strict interpretation of the Code of Nomenclature indicates that I should have abandoned the family name Ascobolaceae, not published till 1884, and adopted instead Bail's name for the family. Fearing the howls of dissent which my colleagues would offer on "losing" the name Ascobolaceae, and also in some hesitancy as to whether in fact the Iodophaneae belong under the Ascobolaceae as treated here or should still be retained in the Pezizaceae as earlier proposed (Kimbrough and Korf, 1967), I have let matters stand unaltered at least for the time being. It is even possible that rediscovery of Klotzsch's type material, presumed lost, would show the type species really has iodine-negative asci!…”
Section: Sphaerosomamentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since I have included the Iodophaneae (to which Sphaerosoma belongs) as a tribe of the Ascobolaceae in this classification, a strict interpretation of the Code of Nomenclature indicates that I should have abandoned the family name Ascobolaceae, not published till 1884, and adopted instead Bail's name for the family. Fearing the howls of dissent which my colleagues would offer on "losing" the name Ascobolaceae, and also in some hesitancy as to whether in fact the Iodophaneae belong under the Ascobolaceae as treated here or should still be retained in the Pezizaceae as earlier proposed (Kimbrough and Korf, 1967), I have let matters stand unaltered at least for the time being. It is even possible that rediscovery of Klotzsch's type material, presumed lost, would show the type species really has iodine-negative asci!…”
Section: Sphaerosomamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…in Kimbr. & Korf, 4 spp., Eckblad (1968), Kimbrough (1966[i]), Kimbrough and Korf (1967), Rehm (1887-1896.…”
Section: Thelebolusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Kimbrough 1966a(Kimbrough , 19666, 1972Kimbrough and Korf 1967;van Brummelen 1967;Wells 1972;Samuelson 1978). Chadefaud's (1942) work represented the major comprehensive study of the apical apparatus for the remainder of the operculate Discomycetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This species appears to fit the concept of Trichobolus in most other respects. Therefore, it is necessary to enlarge the concept of this taxon as given by Kimbrough and Cain (1967). In addition, a new generic description and key are provided along with the description of this additional species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%