2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0074677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A symmetry-orientated divide-and-conquer method for crystal structure prediction

Abstract: Crystal structure prediction has been a subject of topical interest but remains a substantial challenge especially for complex structures as it deals with the global minimization of the extremely rugged high-dimensional potential energy surface. In this paper, a symmetry-orientated divide-and-conquer scheme was proposed to construct a symmetry tree graph, where the entire search space is decomposed into a finite number of symmetry dependent subspaces. An artificial intelligence-based symmetry selection strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While prediction models have been proposed for synthesizability prediction [53], formation energy prediction [54], and e-above-hull calculation, these models and algorithms usually require the availability of the crystal structures. Fortunately, recent progress in template based [55,52], deep learning based [56], and global optimization based crystal structure prediction tools [57,58] have made it possible to guess the crystal structures for increasing families of materials, which can be combined with our composition generators to explore and discover new materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prediction models have been proposed for synthesizability prediction [53], formation energy prediction [54], and e-above-hull calculation, these models and algorithms usually require the availability of the crystal structures. Fortunately, recent progress in template based [55,52], deep learning based [56], and global optimization based crystal structure prediction tools [57,58] have made it possible to guess the crystal structures for increasing families of materials, which can be combined with our composition generators to explore and discover new materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the search process more efficient, instead of pursuing a direct sampling of PES associated with general spatial arrangements of atoms (e.g., PSO), we have developed a symmetry-oriented divide-and-conquer scheme via the construction of a symmetry tree graph that allows for the decomposition of a vast structure space into 230 subspaces based on the space group symmetry (Figure ). Each subspace can be further subdivided into a set of site-symmetry-related groups (crystallographic orbits) and individual structures that are geometry optimized toward related energy minima.…”
Section: Calypso Methodology For Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure prediction of TaB 2 under ambient pressure is performed by the CALYPSO method combined with the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) . This effective method successfully searched the ground-state and metastable-state structures for various systems from zero-dimensional (0D) clusters to two-dimensional (2D) monolayers and to three-dimensional crystals. − During the structure prediction of TaB 2 , 70% of low-lying structures are collected as the specimens to create the candidate structures in the next generation, and the remaining 30% of structures are generated with some special restrictions, such as the symmetries, the bond lengths, and so forth. After 50 generations of structure searches, about 1200 to 1500 low-lying structures of TaB 2 are obtained at ambient pressure.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we perform comprehensive structure searches of TaB 2 by crystal structure analysis by the particle swarm optimization (CALYPSO) structural search method and first-principles calculations. − Our results show that two novel structures of TaB 2 with Cmmm and I 4 1 / amd symmetries can be metastable at ambient pressure, except for the well-known ground-state structure of the P 6/ mmm phase. The subsequent stress–strain calculations of the three structures indicate the abnormal stress responses of TaB 2 in many crystal planes, which are the apparent strain-stiffening behaviors along some main directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%