2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icca.2018.8444174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Symbolic Approach for Multi-target Dynamic Reach-avoid Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a discrete planner can be used to satisfy complex objectives such as coverage, safety, and reachability. The design of discrete planners is widely studied in the literature [12,14,32,33] and is not the focus of this paper. Instead, we are interested in addressing the problem of converting the planner's discrete commands to continuous control signals, as stated below:…”
Section: Hybrid Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a discrete planner can be used to satisfy complex objectives such as coverage, safety, and reachability. The design of discrete planners is widely studied in the literature [12,14,32,33] and is not the focus of this paper. Instead, we are interested in addressing the problem of converting the planner's discrete commands to continuous control signals, as stated below:…”
Section: Hybrid Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a discrete planner can be used to satisfy complex objectives such as coverage, safety, and reachability. The design of discrete planners is widely studied in the literature [12, 14, 32, 33] and is not the focus of this paper. Instead, we are interested in addressing the problem of converting the planner's discrete commands to continuous control signals, as stated below: Problem For the multi‐affine systems described in (1) and a discrete planner G in (10), design a hybrid controller to generate jumpless control signals, ufalse(tfalse), so that the trajectories of the controlled system, xfalse(tfalse), follow the commands of the discrete planner G , while respecting the velocity constraint |x.|Mv.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set is known, in different contexts, as the reach-avoid set [13]- [18]. Providing safety guarantees is not trivial with reachavoid problems and greatly depends on the nature of the system with many techniques available for a variety of system types [19]- [21]. In our case, after a non-conservative state feedback parameterisation of the control strategy, we establish ordering relations between generated closed-loop trajectories in terms of (i) the initial conditions and (ii) the control input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%