2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Swedish environmental rating tool for buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one out of the six studied organizations states that they have a general model for managing sustainability aspects, referred to as "environmental description", which is adjusted to fit each specific renovation project. In addition, another organization said that they used the Swedish environmental rating tool Miljöbyggnad [23] as a steering tool. Among the respondents, it is rare to establish environmental programs and plans; this is done only for extensive redevelopment projects.…”
Section: Renovation Process In Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one out of the six studied organizations states that they have a general model for managing sustainability aspects, referred to as "environmental description", which is adjusted to fit each specific renovation project. In addition, another organization said that they used the Swedish environmental rating tool Miljöbyggnad [23] as a steering tool. Among the respondents, it is rare to establish environmental programs and plans; this is done only for extensive redevelopment projects.…”
Section: Renovation Process In Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are designed for different types of buildings, emphasize different phases of the life cycle, and the structure of the information sources is not neutral and can profoundly influence the outcome [50,56,59,68] and cultural differences influence the priorities of building environmental assessment methods [61]. The context may refer to culture, legislation, and traditions, as well as geographic and climatic conditions [59]. However, by comparing the sustainability indicators and assessment methods in each of the different evaluation tools, we can draw conclusions both about those indicators that are not covered by the tools and thus may need elaboration, and about those indicators that are covered by most tools but that may need some harmonization [57].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are designed for different types of buildings, emphasize different phases of the life cycle, and the structure of the information sources is not neutral and can profoundly influence the outcome [50,56,59,68] and cultural differences influence the priorities of building environmental assessment methods [61]. The context may refer to culture, legislation, and traditions, as well as geographic and climatic conditions [59].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations