2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Suzaku view of IGR J16393–4643

Abstract: The pulsar IGR J16393-4643 belongs to a class of highly absorbed supergiant HMXBs, characterised by very high column density of absorbing matter. We present the results of the simultaneous broad-band pulsation and spectrum analysis, from a 44 kilosec Suzaku observation of the source. The orbital intensity profile created with the SWIFT-BAT light-curve shows an indication of IGR J16393-4643 being an eclipsing system with a short eclipse semi-angle θ E ∼ 17 • . For a supergiant companion star with a 20 R ⊙ radiu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hard X-ray eclipses are always known to be sharp. IGR J16393-4643 is an unusual HMXB system with a neutron star that shows a gradual and partial eclipse even in the hard X-rays (Islam et al 2015). IGR J16393-4643 was detected in the INTEGRAL survey of the galactic plane and was identified to be the same source as AX J1639.0-4642, discovered earlier with ASCA observatory (Bird et al 2004;Sugizaki et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, hard X-ray eclipses are always known to be sharp. IGR J16393-4643 is an unusual HMXB system with a neutron star that shows a gradual and partial eclipse even in the hard X-rays (Islam et al 2015). IGR J16393-4643 was detected in the INTEGRAL survey of the galactic plane and was identified to be the same source as AX J1639.0-4642, discovered earlier with ASCA observatory (Bird et al 2004;Sugizaki et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The source is a highly absorbed (N H ≈ 2.5 × 10 23 cm −2 Bodaghee et al, 2006) pulsar with a spin period of 911s . The orbital period is under debate with a most likely value of 4.24d (Pearlman et al, 2011;Thompson et al, 2006;Islam et al, 2015). The companion is not yet identified (Bodaghee et al, 2012a) but its dynamical mass is estimated as > 7.5M ⊙ (Pearlman et al, 2011;Nespoli et al, 2010a;Chaty et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same response and background files, and adopting the same exposure times as the real data, we simulated 10,000 sets of XMM-Newton (pn and combined MOS1+MOS2) and NuSTAR (FPMA and FPMB) spectra with the FAKEIT command in XSPEC based on the best-3 We have also tried replacing the CUTOFFPL model with the FD-CUT and NPEX models also frequently applied to Galactic neutron stars (e.g. Odaka et al 2013;Fürst et al 2013;Islam et al 2015;Vybornov et al 2017), but these provide identical fits to the CUTOFFPL model, so we do not present the results in full.…”
Section: Time-averaged Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%