2019
DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2019.1575409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sustainability comparison between drilling and milling for hole-enlargement in machining of hardened steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Holes can be machined by drilling, milling, electrical discharge machining, etc. Unfortunately, it is impractical to drill the hole with large diameter [1] . Electrical discharge machining has no macroscopic cutting force, and it is not limited by material hardness, therefore, electrical discharge becomes one of the mainstream technologies for machining super-hard materials [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holes can be machined by drilling, milling, electrical discharge machining, etc. Unfortunately, it is impractical to drill the hole with large diameter [1] . Electrical discharge machining has no macroscopic cutting force, and it is not limited by material hardness, therefore, electrical discharge becomes one of the mainstream technologies for machining super-hard materials [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drilling process accounts for 40% of all metal machining operations and is an inevitable process for assembly operations. 21,22 Although the machinability of magnesium alloys is easy due to low hardness and Young's modulus, 23 it is reported that some problems such as ignition depending on the chip size and built-up edge may occur during machining which complicates the process and affects hole quality. 2426 In order to avoid such problems and to obtain higher quality holes, it is necessary to machine materials produced with different processes and using appropriate parameters, tools, and conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yip et al presented a quantification approach for the evaluation of triple bottom line of machining sustainability in ultraprecision machining of titanium alloys [ 5 ]. Machining sustainability is generally quantified in terms of tool life, specific energy consumption, processing cost, material removal rate, work surface quality, and amount of swarf generated [ 3 , 6 ]. Regarding the milling of Ti–6Al–4V, the effect of cutting speed on temperature is more prominent than those of feed rate and depth of cut [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%