2021
DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A suspected non‐allergic anaphylactic reaction to intravenous administration of atracurium in a dog

Abstract: Hypersensitivity reactions are rare events but have the potential to be life-threatening. They are relatively more common during general anaesthesia. This is potentially due to multiple drugs being administered concurrently. An 8-year-old, female neutered Labrador Retriever with bilateral cataracts was anaesthetised for right phacoemulsification. Soon after atracurium administration, the patient's heart rate (HR) increased, alongside decreases in arterial blood pressure and end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2). Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diphenhydramine appeared to successfully treat the adverse changes seen shortly after administration of rocuronium in this dog. While there were confounding factors in determining the cause of the marked tachycardia and hypotension, it is highly likely that these changes occurred due to a histamine response associated with the use of rocuronium (Mertes & Volcheck, 2015;Testa et al, 2021). writing -original draft and writing -review and editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diphenhydramine appeared to successfully treat the adverse changes seen shortly after administration of rocuronium in this dog. While there were confounding factors in determining the cause of the marked tachycardia and hypotension, it is highly likely that these changes occurred due to a histamine response associated with the use of rocuronium (Mertes & Volcheck, 2015;Testa et al, 2021). writing -original draft and writing -review and editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%