2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-007-9161-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survival guide to fission

Abstract: The fission of a person involves what common sense describes as a single person surviving as two distinct people. Thus, say most metaphysicians, this paradox shows us that common sense is inconsistent with the transitivity of identity. Lewis's theory of overlapping persons, buttressed with tensed identity, gives us one way to reconcile the common sense claims. Lewis's account, however, implausibly says that reference to a person about to undergo fission is ambiguous. A better way to reconcile the claims of com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar view is defended in Gallois . The views defended in Perry and Moyer are also similar in some respects, and can plausibly be read as having the same practical implications in the cases we will be considering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A similar view is defended in Gallois . The views defended in Perry and Moyer are also similar in some respects, and can plausibly be read as having the same practical implications in the cases we will be considering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This line of response is in the same spirit as Moyer's (2008) take on the familiar statue/clay puzzle:…”
Section: Kripkean Rigidity and Occasional Identitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“….” obtains solely in virtue of how the world is at the contextually specified time. (Moyer 2008, pp. 304–5)…”
Section: Kripkean Rigidity and Occasional Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson [141] takes this mere imaginability as an argument against declaring bodily continuity as a logical precondition for personal identity. Our scenario is no more fantastic than other thought experiments that have been employed to disentangle identity from its natural correlates-through neurosurgeons [6,38,51,128,142], amoeba-like duplication [127,143], cloning [144], parallel universes [30], or even swampbeings [66]. To come full circle, some of the philosophical conceptions and puzzle cases are reproduced in cultural creations and thereby further embedded into cultural consciousness [39].…”
Section: The Fission Scenario As Scientific Fiction: Benefits and Valmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If two continuers can be considered to be the same as the original without a sense of contradiction, it is not necessarily the understanding of identity that is responsible for this conflict. It is possible-albeit perhaps unlikely-that participants instead endorse alternative views of persons and conceptualize them as time worms, life histories, or branching persons [127,128]; or allow for two persons cohabiting one body before fission [58]. One might criticize our questions for leading participants to a nonstandard perspective of persons by using continuous scales for eliciting opinions about states after fission that cannot be true in degrees.…”
Section: Intransitivity and Alternative Concepts Of Personsmentioning
confidence: 99%