1973
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/138.7.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey to Assess Potential Human Disease Hazards Along Proposed Sea Level Canal Routes in Panamá and Colombia. IV. Arbovirus Surveillance in Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ) 19 . Nevertheless, in a retrospective study, MAYV was evidenced in sera collected during the construction of canals in Panama and Colombia 20 , which took place between 1904 and 1914. Chronologically, a MAYV fever epidemic occurred in Belém, Brazil in April of 1955.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ) 19 . Nevertheless, in a retrospective study, MAYV was evidenced in sera collected during the construction of canals in Panama and Colombia 20 , which took place between 1904 and 1914. Chronologically, a MAYV fever epidemic occurred in Belém, Brazil in April of 1955.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This neglected tropical virus was first isolated from the sera of forest workers of Mayaro county, Trinidad and Tobago in August-September 1954 [50]. Even earlier evidence of transmission of MAYV in Panama and Colombia between 1904 and 1914 was provided by a retrospective study [51]. This was followed by reporting of MAYV infection in Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Surinam, Peru, Ecuador, French Guinea, Venezuela, and Haiti [46,52].…”
Section: Mayaro Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One case of MAYV was detected in a study carried out from 1966 through 1967 (33). In this instance, a citizen of the United States of America who was conducting studies assessing the feasibility of routes for a new, sea-level canal in Panama or Colombia demonstrated a significant rise in viral MAYV antibodies (33). Unfortunately, due to study group cross-over, it was unclear whether the virus was acquired in Panama or Colombia (33).…”
Section: Panamamentioning
confidence: 99%