A Survey System to Assess Abuse and Misconduct Toward Air Force Students in Occupational Specialty Training

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

Strengthening Workforce Resilience in U.S. Space Command

“…DoD defines hazing as causing another to "suffer or be exposed to any activity which is cruel, abusive, humiliating, oppressive, demeaning, or harmful" (Paparo, 2021). In addition to defining hazing, it is helpful to provide example scenarios, so that service members can build a common understanding of hazing activities (Miller et al, 2019). Hazing prevention should also target peer norms and emphasize bystander interventions (Matthews and Farris, 2022;Waldron, 2012).…”

Countering Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in the U.S. Military: Lessons from RAND Research

“…Support includes making time available for service members to participate in more-robust prevention activities, publicly voicing support for the importance of the programming, setting specific benchmarks for performance, and regularly evaluating whether those benchmarks have been achieved and, if not, instituting improvements and tracking their implementation (Chinman et al, 2020). Although military-specific measures and tools exist that could be used to evaluate prevention approaches (Farris et al, 2019), the services and individual installations do not regularly collect or review evaluation data to drive strategic or operational prevention decisions (Gedney et al, 2018; U.S. Army, undated). Those charged with conducting prevention activities might lack the resources or the skills to carry out evaluations of their prevention activities, and thus might select such activities based on preference rather than on past performance.…”

“…These investigations could supplement the existing research by identifying drivers that might be unique to the military (e.g., differences in command climate, training, and prevention activities; differences in the roles and presence of civilians; differences in the surrounding community). A combination of surveys (Miller et al, 2019) and interview tools (Sadler et al, 2021) might yield the most-useful and actionable data. Multiple studies show that sexual assaults do not happen in a vacuum.…”

Harassment and Discrimination on the Basis of Gender and Race/Ethnicity in the FEMA Workforce

“…In September 2018, FEMA asked the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center (HSOAC), a federally funded research and development center operated by the RAND Corporation, to assist with this effort. RAND has expertise in large epidemiological surveys designed to estimate the prevalence of hard-to-measure, sensitive behaviors, such as sexual harassment (Miller et al, 2019;Morral, Gore, and Schell, 2014;Morral, Gore, and Schell, 2015). The purpose of the survey would be to provide FEMA leadership with insight into the prevalence of workplace harassment, workplace climate, and employee perceptions of leadership.…”