A Survey Report On Elliptic Curve Cryptography

Gajbhiye, Samta; Sharma, Manoj; Dashputre, Samir

doi:10.11591/ijece.v1i2.86

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They claim that the Montgomery Ladder-based ECSMA saves 50% space and 45% time, driven by the Karatsuba multiplier's sub-quadratic complexity and optimized field primitives. Gajbhiye et al (2012) reviewed Elliptic Curve cryptography security, focusing on the performance attributes of the elliptic curve. They suggested that the Koblitz offers superior security features among the various curves and demonstrated how Koblitz curves can efficiently compute ord (p) on any curve P, facilitating an efficient derivation process.…”

Section: Elliptic Curve Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

RSA and Elliptic Curve Encryption System

Ugbedeojo,

Adebiyi,

Aroba

et al. 2024

International Journal of Information Security and Privacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Almost every living species has a motive to communicate electronically with one another and preserve data for immediate or future use. These data are becoming too large to be maintained on personal storage devices. Technological innovation has cleared the path for vast, remote storage known as the cloud. This innovation is being provided as a service to people and organizations due to the high cost of investment and the high-tech skills needed for its maintenance. Despite the many benefits of cloud computing, data privacy, integrity, and access control are issues that require immediate attention. Many studies have been conducted in order to find solutions to these challenges. In this review, the authors look at the numerous methods that have been proposed to address these security challenges. The research revealed that elliptic curve cryptography and the advance encryption system (AES) were the techniques that were most frequently used to address security issues in the digital world.

show abstract

Section: Elliptic Curve Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

RSA and Elliptic Curve Encryption System

Ugbedeojo,

Adebiyi,

Aroba

et al. 2024

International Journal of Information Security and Privacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Elliptic Curve Cryptography is a reliable and efficient public key cryptographic technique that provides equivalent security as other public key cryptographic techniques but with smaller key size [10], [11]. Moreover, It is based on the discrete logarithm problem [12] which states that if K=nxG, then it is easy to derive K with given n and G, but tough to reveal n with given K and G. Thus with ECC, it will be tough for the blackhole attacker node to retrieve the private key from given secret key and public key.…”

Section: Why Ecc?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Elliptic Curve Cryptography Based Data Transmission against Blackhole Attack in MANET

Sultana¹,

Ahmed²

2018

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile nodes roaming around in the hostile environment of mobile adhoc network (MANET) play the role of router as well as terminal. While acting as a router, a node needs to choose a reliable routing protocol. Besides, an encryption algorithm is needed to secure data to be conveyed through the unfriendly atmosphere while acting as a terminal. We have implemented Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) along with Adhoc On Demand Multipath Distance Vector (AOMDV) routing protocol to secure data transmission against blackhole attack in a MANET. ECC, a public key cryptography that works on discrete logarithm problem with a much smaller key size, has been used to encrypt data packets at source node before transmission. We have used AOMDV, a reliable routing protocol compared to its parent protocol, Adhoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV), with a multipath extension, for routing. The encrypted packets transferring between nodes via AOMDV, has been proved secured against blackhole attack. The performance of the secured protocol has been analyzed in terms of different performance metrics and in terms of varying number of blackhole attacker nodes.

show abstract

“…Both the symmetric and asymmetric schemes have trade-off between the security and its resources are constraint [4]. The main problem ofconventional Public key Cryptosystems is that the Key size has to be sufficiently large in order to meet the high level security requirement, resulting in lower speed and consumption of more bandwidth [5].The third technique i.e hybrid key technique which is the combination of symmetric and public key cryptography. It merges the advantages of both schemes.The feasibility of public-key cryptography (PKC) has been proven [6].…”

Section: Overview Of Cryptographymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Comparisons of Cryptographic Algorithms Using Certain Parameters in WSN

Singh¹,

Chauhan²

2017

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have spread its roots in almost every application. Owing to their scattered nature of sensor nodes, they are more prone to attacks. There are certain applications e.g. military, where sensor data"s confidentiality requirement during transmission is essential. Cryptography has a vital role for achieving security in WSNs.WSN has resource constraints like memory size, processing speed and energy consumption which bounds the applicability of existing cryptographic algorithms for WSN. Any good security algorithms has higher energy consumption by the nodes, so it"s a need to choose most energy-efficient cryptographic encryption algorithms for WSNs. This paper surveys different asymmetric algorithms such as RSA, Diffie-Hellman, DSA, ECC, hybrid and DNA cryptography. These algorithms are compared based on their key size, strength, weakness, attacks and possible countermeasures in the form of The main components of sensor network are: sensing field, sensor nodes, base station and internet. The main components of sensor node are: controller, transceiver, power supply, memory and one or more sensors. These nodes have the sensing, processing and communication capabilities to monitor the real-world environment. WSNs have the advantage over the traditional networks in terms of scalability, deployment, applications, robustness, etc. As they are ad-hoc in nature, hence can be deployed in any area like military, environmental observation, syndrome surveillance, supply chain management, fire detection, vision enabling, energy automation, building administration, gaming, health and other commercial and home applications [1].Because of its broad usage in multifarious applications, security becomes the primary issue in WSN. When we provide security to sensor networks, it is more complicated than that of MANET because of the resource limitations of sensor nodes. There are some resource constraints such as energy and power supplies, limited memory, computation and communication capabilities. This is the reason that traditional cryptographic techniques cannot be applied on sensor networks, hence demand of more security in WSNs arises. The security requirements in WSN are authentication, confidentiality, availability, integrity and QoS. These conditions should be met while developing the security algorithm.

show abstract

A Survey Report On Elliptic Curve Cryptography

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

RSA and Elliptic Curve Encryption System

RSA and Elliptic Curve Encryption System

Elliptic Curve Cryptography Based Data Transmission against Blackhole Attack in MANET

A Survey on Comparisons of Cryptographic Algorithms Using Certain Parameters in WSN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About