A survey on the security of cyber-physical systems

Wu, Guoxun; Sun, Jian; Chen, Jie

doi:10.1007/s11768-016-5123-9

Cited by 82 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this cluster, we collect several contributions regarding analysis and implementation of cyber security in CPPS. It has been recognised in [140][141][142] that the concept of security takes a new dimension, when referring to CPS and CPPS. The intrinsic heterogeneity of communication technologies and data exchanges in CPPS are a fertile ground for weak links.…”

Section: Data Analysis: This Cluster Discusses How Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for smart manufacturing control

Rojas

Rauch

2019

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When cyber-physical systems (CPS) are connected to perform smart manufacturing, we have a cyber-physical production system (CPPS). In such systems, CPS collaborate in an intelligent way to obtain and maintain the optimum of the manufacturing process, handle disturbances and adapt to changing conditions. This work, based on a systematic literature review, shows current trends in cyber-physical production systems with a special focus on the role of connectivity and control systems in production. We are looking for the enablers of CPPS focusing on the current evolution of control systems in the smart factory of the future. As a result, a conceptual framework as well as a CPPS control system architecture for the introduction and organisation of enablers for CPPS is presented to support practitioners in the realisation of smart manufacturing control concepts.

show abstract

Section: Data Analysis: This Cluster Discusses How Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for smart manufacturing control

Rojas

Rauch

2019

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The differences between the traditional IT security systems and CPS are based on the identification, assignment and calculation of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, and thus it is necessary to take fully into consideration the CPS characteristics in order to find a suitable and specific risk assessment method . Simulations and model representing the attack designs can help in the better assessment of risks related to the security of CPS providing theoretical guidelines detecting attacks and resilience controls. Risk strategies are effective when the risks are timely identified.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A security risk mitigation framework for cyber physical systems

Zahid

Inayat

Daneva

et al. 2019

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber physical systems (CPSs) are safety‐critical, be it weapon systems, smart medical devices, or grid stations. This makes ensuring security of all the components constituting a CPS unavoidable. The rise in the demand of interconnectedness has made such systems vulnerable to attacks, ie, cyberattacks. Over 170 cases of cyber‐security breaches in CPS were reported over the past two decades. An increase in the number of cyberattack incidents on CPS makes them more exposed and less trustworthy. However, identifying the security requirements of the CPS to pinpoint the relevant risks may help to counteract the potential attacks. Literature reveals that the most targeted security requirements of CPS are authentication, integrity, and availability. However, little attention has been paid on certain crucial security attributes such as data freshness and nonrepudiation. One major reason of security breaches in CPS is the lack of custom or generalized countermeasures. Therefore, we propose a security risk mitigation framework for a CPS focused on constraints, ie, authentication, data integrity, data freshness, nonrepudiation, and confidentiality. Furthermore, we evaluate the proposed work using a case study of a safety critical system. The results show a decrease in the severity of the identified security risks, ie, man‐in‐the‐middle attack, spoofing, and data tempering.

show abstract

“…Each of these layers has its own concerns with regards to dependability and security. Accordingly, many studies tried to point out these issues or suggest countermeasures [2][3][4][5][6], or to point out and to evaluate the cyber-physical vulnerabilities and their impacts on manufacturing systems [7]. In [8], the approach tries to design and to implement a robust cyber physical system, and [9] attempts to model ontology-based dependability in CPSs using FMEA techniques are outlined.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Dependability and Security of Cyber-Physical Production Systems

Bayanifar

Kühnle

2017

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite all its potentials, new industrial revolution enabled by cyberphysical systems (CPS), still has major concerns and obstacles to overcome with regards to dependability and security on its way to be fully appreciated. This study targets these concerns by proposing a generic model for intelligent distributed dependability and security supervision and control mechanisms to enable components to autonomously meet their own security and dependability objectives through real-time distributed improvement cycles, using multi-agent systems approach to enable full exploitation of the model's evolution capabilities.

show abstract

A survey on the security of cyber-physical systems

Cited by 82 publications

References 21 publications

From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for smart manufacturing control

From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for smart manufacturing control

A security risk mitigation framework for cyber physical systems

Enhancing Dependability and Security of Cyber-Physical Production Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About