2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2115399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on the Four Families of Performance Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that due to the presence of negative average returns, the traditional Sharpe ratio turned out to be inappropriate for comparisons across allocation strategies, models, periods and hedging presence. In fact, given two assets, A and B, with the same negative average return, say -1%, and the volatility of A twice the volatility of B, 20% and 10%, respectively, the Sharpe ratio of A would be higher than that of B, -0.05 versus -0.1 (see Caporin et al, 2012 for additional comments). To overcome this limitation, we considered the modified Sharpe of Israelsen (2005) where the average returns are multiplied by the volatility if it is negative, thus restoring the appropriate ordering.…”
Section: In-sample Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that due to the presence of negative average returns, the traditional Sharpe ratio turned out to be inappropriate for comparisons across allocation strategies, models, periods and hedging presence. In fact, given two assets, A and B, with the same negative average return, say -1%, and the volatility of A twice the volatility of B, 20% and 10%, respectively, the Sharpe ratio of A would be higher than that of B, -0.05 versus -0.1 (see Caporin et al, 2012 for additional comments). To overcome this limitation, we considered the modified Sharpe of Israelsen (2005) where the average returns are multiplied by the volatility if it is negative, thus restoring the appropriate ordering.…”
Section: In-sample Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We stress that while (10a) resemble tail-based risk measures, and is not a proper absolute performance measure, see Caporin et al (2014), indicator (11) is novel. It is interesting to notice that Ψ 2 (R p , ψ)…”
Section: Portfolio Performance As Function Of Quantiles Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of one-sided PMs are the adjusted for skewness Sharpe ratio (ASSR) proposed by Zakamouline and Kokebakker (2009), the Generalized Rachev family based on the conditional Value at Risk (Biglova et al 2004), the Farinelli-Tibiletti (FT) family based on both upper and lower partial moments and the Kappa or S-S family (Sortino and Satchell, 2001) based on lower partial moments. Other alternative reward-to-variability ratios are well documeted in Caporin et al (2014) and the references therein. We will also implement PMs based on the certainty equivalent amount as a function of both prudence and temperance coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%