2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/239654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on the Computational Approaches to Identify Drug Targets in the Postgenomic Era

Abstract: Identifying drug targets plays essential roles in designing new drugs and combating diseases. Unfortunately, our current knowledge about drug targets is far from comprehensive. Screening drug targets in the lab is an expensive and time-consuming procedure. In the past decade, the accumulation of various types of omics data makes it possible to develop computational approaches to predict drug targets. In this paper, we make a survey on the recent progress being made on computational methodologies that have been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare MGRDMF with some recent Matrix factorization based techniques proposed for DTI prediction under all the above mentioned croos-validation settings. These methods are very recent in the field and have already been compared against older methods [1]. Apart from the baselines (CMF [58] and GRMF [24]), the comparison of MGRDMF has also been done against a variant of GRMF proposed by us: Multi-GRMF, to observe how the incorporation of multi-graph regularization affects its performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare MGRDMF with some recent Matrix factorization based techniques proposed for DTI prediction under all the above mentioned croos-validation settings. These methods are very recent in the field and have already been compared against older methods [1]. Apart from the baselines (CMF [58] and GRMF [24]), the comparison of MGRDMF has also been done against a variant of GRMF proposed by us: Multi-GRMF, to observe how the incorporation of multi-graph regularization affects its performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, this was done through time-taking and expensive wet-lab experiments. In recent times, the introduction of computational techniques for prediction of interaction probability [1][2][3][4] has paved the way for appropriate and effective alternatives which could help avoid costly candidate failures. These methods take some existing experimentally valid interactions which are publicly available in databases like STITCH [5], ChEMBL [6], KEGG DRUG [7], DrugBank [8] and SuperTarget [9] to predict the interaction probability of unknown drug-target pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The living organism's genetic map, medication history, and other traits could effect on phenotypic outcomes of a drug. So, we could not conclude that a similar phenotype corresponds to the same mode of action [17], [7]. Finally, it should be noticed that side effect information could be confused by a patient's medication history, genotype, and other hidden factors [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[4a, 5] Therefore, phenotypic drug discoveryb ased on pharmacologically active natural products remains ap owerful strategy forr apidly evaluating the relevant chemical landscape in search of novel therapeutic mechanisms of action. [6] However,l ead identification and guided chemical optimization based on ad efined molecular mechanism of action remains at ime-consuming process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%