2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iceeot.2016.7755665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on software effort estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this step the amount of effort for a specific change request implementation will be estimated after receiving the required information such as Value of A (constant), Scale Drivers Exponent B and Value of Effort Multipliers, Development Phase and change request completion date. The Value of A (constant), Scale Drivers Exponent B and Value of Effort Multipliers will be calculated by using COCOMO II [27] as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Step 4: Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step the amount of effort for a specific change request implementation will be estimated after receiving the required information such as Value of A (constant), Scale Drivers Exponent B and Value of Effort Multipliers, Development Phase and change request completion date. The Value of A (constant), Scale Drivers Exponent B and Value of Effort Multipliers will be calculated by using COCOMO II [27] as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Step 4: Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two most common non-algorithmic SCEE models are: Expert Judgement and Estimation by Analogy. Expert Judgement is a non-algorithmic SEE model [17]. According to Sufyan, et al [29] usually software development teams preferred to use expert judgement effort estimation model instead of other estimation models because of its flexibility and simplicity.…”
Section: Software Change Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common algorithmic-based models are: COCOMO II [13], Function Point Analysis [14] and Use-Case Points [15]. Whereas, some of the non-algorithmic-based models are: Expert Judgement [16], Analogy Based Estimation [17] and Delphi [18]. Although, several extensions of these models are developed to estimate effort in Software Development Phase (SDP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many cost estimation methods and techniques have been suggested for collocated environment during last decades before emergence of GSD concept. They are broadly divided into categories i.e., Algorithmic models, Artificial Intelligence and Expert estimation based techniques (Usharani, Ananth, & Velmurugan, 2016). Algorithmic methods like COCOMO (Constructive Cost Model), Putnams Model, Function Point based models and SEER-SEM Models make use of input like source line of code, function point and cost driver to perform the process of estimation by using mathematical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%