2010
DOI: 10.5120/1193-1671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on QoS based routing protocols for MANET

Abstract: In mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), the provision of quality of service (QoS) guarantees is much more challenging mainly due to node mobility and resource constraints. Therefore it is important that routing protocols incorporate QoS metrics in route finding and maintenance to support end-to-end QoS. The traditional AODV protocol seems less satisfactory in terms of routing data to end systems. Many revisions are done to the traditional AODV protocol to meet QoS challenges focused on bandwidth, end to end delay,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a path is required the corresponding QoS parameter values associated with each path are calculated, and the path with the best value is chosen. The commonly used QoS parameters in early QoS routing protocols, such as QoS-AODV (Quality of Service AODV) and on-demand QoS routing (OQR) [5], are end-to-end delay and bandwidth. Other protocols, e.g., Reliable AODV and AODV Backup Routing [5], are designed to optimize packet delivery reliability in the presence of network dynamics, so they use packet delivery reliability, or loss ratio, as their QoS parameters.…”
Section: A Existing Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a path is required the corresponding QoS parameter values associated with each path are calculated, and the path with the best value is chosen. The commonly used QoS parameters in early QoS routing protocols, such as QoS-AODV (Quality of Service AODV) and on-demand QoS routing (OQR) [5], are end-to-end delay and bandwidth. Other protocols, e.g., Reliable AODV and AODV Backup Routing [5], are designed to optimize packet delivery reliability in the presence of network dynamics, so they use packet delivery reliability, or loss ratio, as their QoS parameters.…”
Section: A Existing Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If path gets failed while data packet transmission, source node repairs path or restarts the route selection procedure towards destination which results in control packet overhead in network and leads bandwidth wastage [2]. Along with this many other challenging factors and problems such as Chanel Capacity Constraints, Unpredictable Channel Access Delay, Inaccurate Bandwidth Estimation, and Network Heterogeneity are available for providing QOS in MANET [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. To address such challenges number of design philosophy and routing protocols are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address such challenges number of design philosophy and routing protocols are available. Based on how the information is acquired and maintained, MANET's routing protocols are categorized in to proactive, reactive, and hybrid [3]. Brief information about these categories is given in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6] OLSR enhanced by Multi-Constrained Path (MCP) QoS Routing, this method based on nonlinear cost function which is the combination of multiple additive QoS parameters, simulation demonstrates the important improvement over the standard protocol. Issues involved with QoS routing is studies in [7], then the authors presents an overview and comparison of existing QoS based revisions done on AODV protocol. In [8] the impact of scalability on three different Ad-hoc (Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV), AODV and DSR) are analyzed, the result show that the performance of DSR decrease when the size of network increase and the overall performance of DSDV is less than AODV and DSR whereas AODV is QoS-aware routing protocol under the effect of scalability in terms of variation in number of nodes, mobility rate and packet intervals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%