2016
DOI: 10.14257/ijfgcn.2016.9.11.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Organization and Positioning of Nodes in Wireless Sensor Network

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the relationship between the optimal number of layers (L) and the node communication radius (r_com) at different node densities P (the number of nodes per square meter; P [1, 0.3]) in the circle with radius R=l00m. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the inter-node communication radius gradually increased but the corresponding optimal number of layers declined with the decrease in the node density P. The relationship reveals that, the nodes are more likely to communicate with each other if there are lots of nodes, that is, the neighbouring nodes are closer to each other [12,13]. In this case, the communication radius r_com of nodes gets shorter, while the optimal number of layers L grows.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussion Of Mdf4lwsn Architecturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 5 shows the relationship between the optimal number of layers (L) and the node communication radius (r_com) at different node densities P (the number of nodes per square meter; P [1, 0.3]) in the circle with radius R=l00m. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the inter-node communication radius gradually increased but the corresponding optimal number of layers declined with the decrease in the node density P. The relationship reveals that, the nodes are more likely to communicate with each other if there are lots of nodes, that is, the neighbouring nodes are closer to each other [12,13]. In this case, the communication radius r_com of nodes gets shorter, while the optimal number of layers L grows.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussion Of Mdf4lwsn Architecturementioning
confidence: 96%