2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on image-based insect classification

Abstract: International audienceEntomology has had many applications in many biological domains (i.e insect counting as a biodiversity index). To meet a growing biological demand and to compensate a decreasing workforce amount, automated entomology has been around for decades. This challenge has been tackled by computer scientists as well as by biologists themselves. This survey investigates fourty-four studies on this topic and tries to give a global picture on what are the scientific locks and how the problem was addr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing our results to those obtained from other convolutional neural networks, built for the specific purpose of identifying other groups of arthropods (e.g.,Marques et al, 2018), there is scope for increasing both classification recall and taxonomic resolution.Either image quality, network structure, number of classes to predict, or the image recording perspective could explain the differences.When comparing precision and accuracy of dorsal perspective images of ants byMarques et al (2018) we achieve comparable results (precision 54.7% and balanced accuracy 75.3% vs. 52.0% and 59.0%).For a range of other studies that classify arthropods to species level, the results are comparable, even though fewer species are typically used in classification(Martineau et al, 2017). van Horn et al(2017) presented a species level trained network based on Inception ResNet v2 and 675,000 images among 5,000 species of plants and animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing our results to those obtained from other convolutional neural networks, built for the specific purpose of identifying other groups of arthropods (e.g.,Marques et al, 2018), there is scope for increasing both classification recall and taxonomic resolution.Either image quality, network structure, number of classes to predict, or the image recording perspective could explain the differences.When comparing precision and accuracy of dorsal perspective images of ants byMarques et al (2018) we achieve comparable results (precision 54.7% and balanced accuracy 75.3% vs. 52.0% and 59.0%).For a range of other studies that classify arthropods to species level, the results are comparable, even though fewer species are typically used in classification(Martineau et al, 2017). van Horn et al(2017) presented a species level trained network based on Inception ResNet v2 and 675,000 images among 5,000 species of plants and animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Image classifications used for species identification have dramatically increased in accuracy, performance, and in the number of taxa analyzed (Marques et al, 2018;Martineau et al, 2017;Norouzzadeh et al, 2018;Schneider, Taylor, & Kremer, 2018;Van Horn et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of insects poses a considerable challenge for computer vision (Martineau et al, 2017). 468…”
Section: Conclusion 467mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive study is done in [38] on image based insect classification. This study discussed on type of images, how to extract feature with different methods and classification methods with their issues and database.…”
Section: Image Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%