2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2019.00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Applications of Quantified Boolean Formulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is equivalent to saying that each addition of a block of quantifiers makes the validity problem computationally harder since the validity problem for prenex and closed QBFs is Σ p n -complete if Q 1 = ∃ and Π p n -complete if Q 1 = ∀. While QBFs can be harder to decide compared to standard Boolean formulas, they do allow for exponentially more succinct encodings of problems in domains such as planning, non-monotonic reasoning, formal verification and the synthesis of computing systems (e.g., Giunchiglia et al, 2009;Shukla et al, 2019). This explains the extensive efforts dedicated to developing QBF solvers in the past few decades (see http://www.qbflib.org).…”
Section: Variable Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to saying that each addition of a block of quantifiers makes the validity problem computationally harder since the validity problem for prenex and closed QBFs is Σ p n -complete if Q 1 = ∃ and Π p n -complete if Q 1 = ∀. While QBFs can be harder to decide compared to standard Boolean formulas, they do allow for exponentially more succinct encodings of problems in domains such as planning, non-monotonic reasoning, formal verification and the synthesis of computing systems (e.g., Giunchiglia et al, 2009;Shukla et al, 2019). This explains the extensive efforts dedicated to developing QBF solvers in the past few decades (see http://www.qbflib.org).…”
Section: Variable Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While QBFs can be harder to decide compared to standard (non-quantified) Boolean formulas, they do allow for exponentially more succinct encodings of various problems in domains such as planning, non-monotonic reasoning, formal verification and the synthesis of computing systems; see e.g., (Giunchiglia, Marin, & Narizzano, 2009;Shukla, Biere, Pulina, & Seidl, 2019). This explains the extensive efforts dedicated to developing QBF solvers in the past few decades (see http://www.qbflib.org).…”
Section: Variable Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a coincidence, but is guaranteed by the definition of SAUNF. Hence, at recursion level 5 of SkGen, any vector of functions f 3 (i), f 4 (i) can be returned in line 2 of Algorithm 1 as a Skolem function vector for (p 3 , p 4 ) in H (2) .…”
Section: B Generating Skolem Functions From Saunf Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skolem functions (and their counterparts, called Herbrand functions) can be thought of as "certificates" that help us independently verify the results of satisfiability checking for Quantified Boolean Formulas, as done in [1]. QBFsatisfiability solving is used today in diverse applications [2], from planning to program repair to reactive synthesis and the like. Having certificates not only helps to verify correctness of QBF-satisfiability checks, but also has other benefits like providing a feasible plan in a planning problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%