2013
DOI: 10.1109/surv.2013.031413.00130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Wireless Communications and Propagation Modeling in Underground Mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
118
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
118
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Radio Propagation model through the tunnel. The radio propagation behaviour in the tunnel-like environment has been studied and reported in the literature [18][19][20][21]. Next there are several distributions for modelling the wave path loss; namely, Rayleigh, Nakagami, Rice, Weibull and log-normal shadowing are among the most commonly used models.…”
Section: Figure 1 Overview Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radio Propagation model through the tunnel. The radio propagation behaviour in the tunnel-like environment has been studied and reported in the literature [18][19][20][21]. Next there are several distributions for modelling the wave path loss; namely, Rayleigh, Nakagami, Rice, Weibull and log-normal shadowing are among the most commonly used models.…”
Section: Figure 1 Overview Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our simulation purpose, we choose Ray-Tracing model considering one reflection for propagation modelling; and for path loss to used log-distance path loss model. Compared to other models we prefered Ray-Tracing model for its mathematical simplicity [18] and ease of implementation fir the simulated cases. Coefficient used in the radio propagation model were derived from experimental readings, for reproduction of this work in some real mine or underground tunnel, an experimentally developed RSSI map can be used.…”
Section: Figure 1 Overview Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the mining industry reliance on wireless communications, radio propagation in surface mines has not been explored as extensively as in underground mines [8]. In the case of open-pit mines, only a limited set of references was found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically these locations are fraught with multiple natural and industrial hazards. Therefore, there is a need to deploy wireless sensor networks to monitor events (i.e., structural integrity, dangerous chemicals, and health of workers) [1], [2]. Wireless communication and sensory equipment are constrained by electrical safety, hostile propagation environment, electromagnetic (EM) noise in these environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge in subterranean (i.e., tunnels and mines) and industrial confined environments (i.e., pipe networks) is that the propagation pathloss for EM waves can be very high. For example, in tunnels and underground mines, the pathloss distance exponent can be greater than 4 for a wide range of radio frequencies (0.9 to 2.4 GHz) [2]. When the pipe or tunnel network can not act as a wave-guide for the data bearing EM wave, the pathloss is even greater [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%