2005
DOI: 10.1192/pb.29.5.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of ward round practice

Abstract: Aims and MethodA postal questionnaire was sent to consultant psychiatrists in the West Midlands to establish their current ward round practice. This questionnaire addressed ward round etiquette, practical issues and educational function. Consultants received only one mailing.ResultsA total of 96 (out of 139) consultants replied (69% response rate). The majority of consultants saw patients on the ward round (97%) and all consultants introduced both themselves and team members to the patient; 72% explained the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the concept of pharmaceutical care is not yet implemented in these public hospitals, despite their being academic institutions and the biggest referral hospital of the province. That is consistent with findings from elsewhere about the confusion regarding ward round practice -for instance, Price states that little is known about the ward rounds practice amongst both professionals and patients (Price 2005), echoing views of other authors (Hodgson, Jamal & Gayathri 2005;White & Assign pharmacists specific wards on rotational basis 3 (5.8) †, Analysed only for the 52 respondents who made suggestions; %, percentage of the respondents who made the suggestions (n = 52) (not of the total number of respondents. Respondents could make more than one suggestion; percentages do not add up to 100%); CPD, continuing professional development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Clearly, the concept of pharmaceutical care is not yet implemented in these public hospitals, despite their being academic institutions and the biggest referral hospital of the province. That is consistent with findings from elsewhere about the confusion regarding ward round practice -for instance, Price states that little is known about the ward rounds practice amongst both professionals and patients (Price 2005), echoing views of other authors (Hodgson, Jamal & Gayathri 2005;White & Assign pharmacists specific wards on rotational basis 3 (5.8) †, Analysed only for the 52 respondents who made suggestions; %, percentage of the respondents who made the suggestions (n = 52) (not of the total number of respondents. Respondents could make more than one suggestion; percentages do not add up to 100%); CPD, continuing professional development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2005), assessing the views of consultant psychiatrists, found that the majority of responders saw the ward round as ‘a compromise between professional efficiency and patient satisfaction’ (p. 172). It was also found that nursing and the medical profession constituted the core of the ward rounds (Hodgson et al. 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against such policy background, it is important to note that the prevailing form and structure of the 'traditional' psychiatric ward round, as described earlier, might be viewed as a somewhat controversial practice, both from a professional and patient perspective. One survey (Hodgson et al 2005), assessing the views of consultant psychiatrists, found that the majority of responders saw the ward round as 'a compromise between professional efficiency and patient satisfaction ' (p. 172). It was also found that nursing and the medical profession constituted the core of the ward rounds (Hodgson et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, there are fewer studies about ward round practice in psychiatry. Existing works focus mainly on the patients’ view of ward rounds and practical aspects without studying the required skills of a clinician [6, 7, 38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%