2016
DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Veterinarians’ Attitudes toward Euthanasia of Companion Animals in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study in Japan found a significant difference in survival times in those treated with trilostane and those untreated. Interestingly, due to cultural preferences, euthanasia was rarely conducted in Japan reducing some bias that can easily be introduced into observational veterinary studies 6 33 . A future study could be warranted to further investigate the benefits of trilostane treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study in Japan found a significant difference in survival times in those treated with trilostane and those untreated. Interestingly, due to cultural preferences, euthanasia was rarely conducted in Japan reducing some bias that can easily be introduced into observational veterinary studies 6 33 . A future study could be warranted to further investigate the benefits of trilostane treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results of a US survey 26 demonstrate that as veterinarians age, willingness to comply with client's wishes increased relative to the interests of patients. Given the importance of decisions associated with ethical dilemmas to animal welfare, animal owners and veterinarians, there is limited scientific literature examining how veterinarians balance or prioritise client and animal interests when these are at odds, the relationship between specific clinical situations veterinarians encounter and stress 7 27 or the opinions of small animal veterinarians regarding the ethical context of euthanasia 22 24 28 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is difficult to determine the cause of disengagement at lower levels of euthanasia frequency, potential causes include low skill utilization driving disengagement or self‐selecting out of performing euthanasia for reasons related to disengagement. Sugita and Irimajiri (2016) found that 20% of the veterinarians surveyed had not participated in euthanasia in the past year. This supports the potential for veterinarians to opt‐out of participating in euthanasia, while remaining in the profession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal euthanasia has been described as "the best and the worst" of the veterinary profession (Morris, 2012a(Morris, , 2012b. Practitioners report that it is meaningful and positive to end the suffering of animals and avert future suffering, and to be present for clients during this experience (Sugita & Irimajiri, 2016). Román-Muñiz et al (2021) illustrate this in their research with dairy caretakers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%