A survey of values, technologies and contexts in pervasive healthcare

Detweiler, Christian; Hindriks, Koen V.

doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2015.09.002

Cited by 25 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Response scales:^1; totally disagree, 2; disagree, 3; neither agree nor disagree, 4; agree, 5; totally agree. * 1; totally agree, 2; agree, 3; neither agree nor disagree, 4; disagree, 5; totally disagree.~1; most definitely not, 2; definitely not, 3; perhaps, perhaps not, 4; definitely, 5; most definitely of the care providers, as found by Detweiler and Hindriks [14] and Ienca, Wangmo, Jotterand, Kressig, and Elger [53]. Strong leadership combined with shared mental models among nursing staff have previously been found to be associated with prompt response to calls in hospital settings [4,54], as well as in a geriatric evaluation facility [55].…”

Section: Safety Firstmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…To remediate this, pervasive and internet-of-things (IOT) technologies in WNCSs model the input from mobile transceivers (wristbands or pendants) and ambient or body-worn sensors by ontologies or statistics, spatiotemporal reasoning and decision-making techniques. The WNCSs allow detection of unattended events and hazardous situations, support prevention and timely treatment, and reduce injury and harm [14][15][16][17]. Thus, WNCSs offer new affordances, properties and interactions, to patients who are not able to actively or consciously interact with the systems.…”

Section: New Affordances For Residentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nursing staff’s evaluation of facilitators and barriers during implementation of wireless nurse call systems in residential care facilities. A cross-sectional study

Dugstad

Sundling

Nilsen

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Traditional nurse call systems used in residential care facilities rely on patients to summon assistance for routine or emergency needs. Wireless nurse call systems (WNCS) offer new affordances for persons unable to actively or consciously engage with the system, allowing detection of hazardous situations, prevention and timely treatment, as well as enhanced nurse workflows. This study aimed to explore facilitators and barriers of implementation of WNCSs in residential care facilities. Methods: The study had a cross-sectional descriptive design. We collected data from care providers (n = 98) based on the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovation (MIDI) framework in five Norwegian residential care facilities during the first year of WNCS implementation. The self-reporting MIDI questionnaire was adapted to the contexts. Descriptive statistics were used to explore participant characteristics and MIDI item and determinant scores. MIDI items to which ≥20% of participants disagreed/totally disagreed were regarded as barriers and items to which ≥80% of participants agreed/totally agreed were regarded as facilitators for implementation.Results: More facilitators (n = 22) than barriers (n = 6) were identified. The greatest facilitators, reported by 98% of the care providers, were the expected outcomes: the importance and probability of achieving prompt call responses and increased safety, and the normative belief of unit managers. During the implementation process, 87% became familiar with the systems, and 86 and 90%, respectively regarded themselves and their colleagues as competent users of the WNCS. The most salient barriers, reported by 37%, were their lack of prior knowledge and that they found the WNCS difficult to learn. No features of the technology were identified as barriers.Conclusions: Overall, the care providers gave a positive evaluation of the WNCS implementation. The barriers to implementation were addressed by training and practicing technological skills, facilitated by the influence and support by the manager and the colleagues within the residential care unit. WNCSs offer a range of advanced applications and services, and further research is needed as more WNCS functionalities are implemented into residential care services.

show abstract

Section: Safety Firstmentioning

confidence: 71%

Section: New Affordances For Residentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nursing staff’s evaluation of facilitators and barriers during implementation of wireless nurse call systems in residential care facilities. A cross-sectional study

Dugstad

Sundling

Nilsen

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These are physical well-being, social well-being, freedom, privacy, responsibility, and safety [6]. In the reviewed publications only privacy is explicitly mentioned.…”

Section: Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the inclusion of values into technology development [31] and especially into design of technologies in nursing is demanded by the literature and an ,unreflective handling' of technology in nursing is occasionally criticized [6,32], our review shows that values are only barely recognized for designing and evaluating AR in nursing. Methods like Value sensitive design or scenario based design are possibilities to integrate values into the shape of a technology design [31,33].…”

Section: Comparison With Prior Workmentioning

confidence: 99%