Proceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand
DOI: 10.1109/iscnz.1996.555273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of strategic information systems planning in Australian companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ward and Griffiths [31] found that despite a belief in its importance in the past decade, many organizations have developed perfectly sound IT strategies that had been left to gather dust. Similarly, Falconer and Hodgett [32] in their Australian survey found that proportion claiming to undertake strategic IT planning ranged from 58% in large organizations to 29% in medium-sized organizations and only 19% in small organizations.…”
Section: Strategic Planning Process Among Smesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ward and Griffiths [31] found that despite a belief in its importance in the past decade, many organizations have developed perfectly sound IT strategies that had been left to gather dust. Similarly, Falconer and Hodgett [32] in their Australian survey found that proportion claiming to undertake strategic IT planning ranged from 58% in large organizations to 29% in medium-sized organizations and only 19% in small organizations.…”
Section: Strategic Planning Process Among Smesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Literature is full of studies that has not only highlighted the various IT strategies that are applied and used among SMEs [25,31,32,39,40] but also included studies that highlighted the benefits of having IT strategic methods [7,25] and studies focusing on the barriers to IT strategy development [7,51]. At the outset, review of the literature was examined from more general studies focusing on the impact of the strategic IT processes on the organizations to the specific studies that has provided a base for this study.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as discussed later in this article, the survey in this research was conducted in Norway where the organizations are smaller than those in previous studies, leading to a potential expectation that there would be a lower percentage of organizations with a formal IT strategy. For example, in an Australian survey, the number of respondent organizations that claimed to undertake strategic IS planning ranged from 58% in large organizations to 29% in medium-sized organizations and 19% in small organizations (Falconer & Hodgett, 1997).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detail dimension refers to the implementation content which may be the whole plan, one or more projects in the plan, or one or more systems in one project. Implementation content thus refers to a plan consisting of one or several projects (Bryson & Bromiley, 1993;Shoval & Giladi, 1996;Falconer & Hodgett, 1997), and a project consisting of one or several systems. The term project is defined as the means by which the organization's technological, organizational, and external assets are mobilised and transformed (Williams, 1992, p 36): 'Projects, or initiatives as termed in this study, then, are the vehicles through which an organization's competitive and technology strategies are operationalised into organizational outputs'.…”
Section: Installedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS planners dedicate a good deal effort on strategy planning, although it has a small impact on planning effectiveness, and not enough effort into strategy implementation planning, which has a greater impact in leveraging IT (Newkirk and Lederer, 2006). Though organizations engage extensively in strategic IS planning, the level of implementation has been low (Falconer and Hodgett, 1997;Finnegan et al, 1997;Lederer and Sethi, 1998;Gottschalk, 2001). However, failure to implement IS strategies can lead to lost opportunities, duplicated efforts, incompatible systems and wasted resources (Lederer and Mendelow, 1993;Galliers, 1994;Premkumar and King, 1994;Tan et al 1995;Lederer and Salmela, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%