Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference 1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-81484-8_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Some Physical Defects Arising in Metal Working Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deformation and failure of the studied alloy were modeled using Johnson and Cook (JC) flow stress [4] and damage [19] models given sequentially as…”
Section: Materials Models and Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deformation and failure of the studied alloy were modeled using Johnson and Cook (JC) flow stress [4] and damage [19] models given sequentially as…”
Section: Materials Models and Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the CWR has not found widespread applications among the metal forming industry, partly due to the lack of adequate technical knowledge on work piece failure mechanisms and partly due to the complexity of tool design [3]. There are basically three major defect groups in the CWR [4]. Excessive slip between work piece and tools results in improper deformation, misalignment and irregular cross-section of work piece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAT_SIMPLIFIED_JOHNSON_COOK material model, material type 98, was used to model 1050 H14 aluminum alloy. Johnson and Cook (JC) flow stress model is given as [14] r ¼ ½A þ Be…”
Section: Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the primary concerns is the failure mechanisms encountered in the CWR process make it very difficult to design the tooling. The three major failure mechanisms encountered during the CWR include [2]: (1) an improperly formed workpiece cross section (2) external defects on the surface of the workpiece (i.e., spiral grooves) and (3) internal defects within the workpiece (voids and cracks). The formation of internal defects in the CWR process, which is the focus of this work, can be attributed to several possible mechanisms.…”
Section: Workpiece Deformation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%