2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of serendipity in recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
183
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
183
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers consider novel and unexpected items serendipitous (Zhang et al, 2012), while others suggest that serendipitous items are relevant and unexpected (Maksai et al, 2015). Although there is no agreement on the definition of serendipity (Kotkov et al, 2016b), in this paper, the term serendipitous items refers to items relevant, novel and unexpected to a user (Kotkov et al, 2016a;Kotkov et al, 2016b):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers consider novel and unexpected items serendipitous (Zhang et al, 2012), while others suggest that serendipitous items are relevant and unexpected (Maksai et al, 2015). Although there is no agreement on the definition of serendipity (Kotkov et al, 2016b), in this paper, the term serendipitous items refers to items relevant, novel and unexpected to a user (Kotkov et al, 2016a;Kotkov et al, 2016b):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recommender systems are software tools that suggest items of use to users (Ricci et al, 2011;Kotkov et al, 2016a). An item is "a piece of information that refers to a tangible or digital object, such as a good, a service or a process that a recommender system suggests to the user in an interaction through the Web, email or text message" (Kotkov et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations