A survey of retirement intentions of baby boomers: an overview of health, social and economic determinants

Abstract

BackgroundGovernments have been implementing policies aimed at halting the trend towards early retirement for Baby Boomers. Public policies can have a strong effect on when a person retires and this analysis contributes to an improved understanding of retirement aspirations in regards to health, social, workplace and economic determinants.MethodsIn October 2011 a telephone survey was undertaken with participants aged 50 to 65 years who were in paid employment and who had been in the workforce for the previous three years. Participants were obtained from two identical South Australian cohort studies - the North West Adelaide Health Study and the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study. The results of the telephone survey were linked to the original cohort data. Data were weighted by sex, age, postcode and probability of selection in the household. Work related questions included how much they thought about their retirement, current occupation, employment status, type of workplace and hours worked per week. Health related questions included current smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, self-reported health status and overall life satisfaction. Uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were undertaken to compare the different associations between people who were and were not intending to retire.ResultsIn total, 25.9% (n = 210) of people who were currently in paid employment indicated that they intend to retire completely from the workforce. The remainder indicated that they will continue to work (41.8% retire from full-time work but work part-time, 25.7% continue working part-time but reduce their current hours, and 6.7% never retire). The multi-variable results indicate that those with lower education, having a savings habit, and sales workers more likely to anticipate complete retirement. The self-employed, and those thinking only moderately about retirement, were more likely to extend their working life beyond age 65.ConclusionAn important finding of this study is the large number of Baby Boomers who indicated that they would be happy to work part-time or never retire. Policies and continued dialogue aimed at making the workplace a safe, flexible and welcoming environment to accommodate this wish, and to entice others to take up this option over complete withdrawal from the labour force, is required.

“On the move, or staying put?” An analysis of intrametropolitan residential mobility and ageing in place

“…Evidence in Australia shows that transition to retirement can occur over a broad age‐span extending from the ages of 40 to 70 years (Sander & Bell, ). In the coming years, the median age of retirement will rise with changes to the pension eligibility age in many countries, such as England and Australia (Taylor, Pilkington, Feist, Dal Grande, & Hugo, ). This is likely to result in a delayed peak in mobility, with people moving later in preparation for retirement.…”

Occupational class and working beyond the retirement age: a cohort study

“…However, disability pensions only account for a minority of all pensions; a greater impact on the public economy may Virtanen et al come from the remaining working population having the potential to prolong their work careers voluntarily. Some studies have examined intentions (rather than actual decisions) of people to continue working after the age of 65 years and found that high education (a correlate of high occupational class), good physical health, and good psychosocial working conditions were associated with intentions to work longer (15)(16)(17). Some studies have focused on "bridge employment", that is, having a paid job after retirement.…”

Pre‐retirement job and the work‐to‐retirement occupational transition process in Australia: A review

“…There were three qualitative studies (Pillay et al . ; Quine, Bernard & Kendig, ; Shacklock, ), 11 quantitative studies (de Vaus, Wells, Kendig & Quine, ; Jackson & Walter, ; Kendig et al ., ; Knox; McPhedran, ; Noone, O'Loughlin & Kendig, ; Pillay, Kelly & Tones, , ; Schofield & Beard, ; Schofield, Fletcher, Page & Callander, ; Taylor, Pilkington, Feist, Dal Grande & Hugo, ) and one paper containing both quantitative and qualitative studies (Quine, Wells, de Vaus & Kendig, ). Using the National Health and Medical Research Council () levels of evidence, there were two Level III‐2 studies, one Level III‐3 study and 13 Level IV studies (Table ).…”