1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02254871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians and researchers use phallometry to quantify the sexual interests of sexual offenders against children (e.g., Howes, 1995). A meta-analytic review of 61 sex offender follow-up studies found that phallometrically assessed sexual arousal to children was the strongest predictor of subsequent sexual offenses among all the variables that were examined (Hanson & Bussière, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians and researchers use phallometry to quantify the sexual interests of sexual offenders against children (e.g., Howes, 1995). A meta-analytic review of 61 sex offender follow-up studies found that phallometrically assessed sexual arousal to children was the strongest predictor of subsequent sexual offenses among all the variables that were examined (Hanson & Bussière, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason why it has been difficult to create a reliable database that would provide normative data is that different laboratories seem to take pride in developing their own stimuli and procedures. This is revealed in a sobering account of penile plethysmography as it occurs in 48 laboratories in the USA and Canada (Howes, 1995). Howes describes an unacceptably wide range of stimuli, norms largely non-existent and a methodology that is often questionable.…”
Section: Lack Of Standardization and Normative Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has also been noted that many programs conduct phallometric assessments using technicians who have received little or no formal training in either the assessment methodology or interpretation of results (Howes, 1995). At best, many of these clinicians will have been trained on the job by a more experienced operators who themselves may or may not have been formally trained.…”
Section: Technician Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%