Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Research suggests it is difficult to learn mathematics in the fully asynchronous online (FAO) instructional modality, yet little is known about associated teaching and assessment practices. In this study we investigate FAO mathematics assessment and feedback practices in particular consideration of both claims and findings that these practices have a powerful influence on learning.A survey questionnaire was constructed and completed by 70 FAO undergraduate mathematics instructors, mostly from the US, who were each asked to detail their assessment and feedback practices in a single FAO mathematics course. Alongside these questions, participants also answered the 16-item version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. A novel feedback framework was also created and used to examine how feedback practices may be related to participants' approaches to teaching.Results show that assessment and feedback practices are varied and complex: In particular, we found there was not a simple emphasis on summative assessment instruments, nor a concomitant expectation these would always be invigilated. Though richer assessment feedback appears to be emphasized, evidence suggests this feedback may not be primarily directed at advancing student learning. Moreover, we found evidence of a reliance on computer-human interactions (e.g. via CAA systems) and further evidence of a decline in human interactions, suggesting a dynamic that is both consistent with current online learning theory and claims FAO mathematics courses are becoming commodified. Several avenues for further research are suggested.
Research suggests it is difficult to learn mathematics in the fully asynchronous online (FAO) instructional modality, yet little is known about associated teaching and assessment practices. In this study we investigate FAO mathematics assessment and feedback practices in particular consideration of both claims and findings that these practices have a powerful influence on learning.A survey questionnaire was constructed and completed by 70 FAO undergraduate mathematics instructors, mostly from the US, who were each asked to detail their assessment and feedback practices in a single FAO mathematics course. Alongside these questions, participants also answered the 16-item version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. A novel feedback framework was also created and used to examine how feedback practices may be related to participants' approaches to teaching.Results show that assessment and feedback practices are varied and complex: In particular, we found there was not a simple emphasis on summative assessment instruments, nor a concomitant expectation these would always be invigilated. Though richer assessment feedback appears to be emphasized, evidence suggests this feedback may not be primarily directed at advancing student learning. Moreover, we found evidence of a reliance on computer-human interactions (e.g. via CAA systems) and further evidence of a decline in human interactions, suggesting a dynamic that is both consistent with current online learning theory and claims FAO mathematics courses are becoming commodified. Several avenues for further research are suggested.
Un-proctored fully asynchronous1 online courses now appear to be a reality in all discipline areas. With full degree programs being offered online, it has become a badge of honor, to some colleges, to graduate students that have never stepped foot on the physical college campus nor have never before met any college representative, faculty, or staff. To many involved in managing, teaching, and implementing these online courses, the idea of academic integrity related to courses taught in a fully online un-proctored modality is therefore of great interest and concern. This review represents a deliberate effort to distinguish the issue of academic integrity in fully asynchronous online courses into two categories: “Writing-Based” (WB) vs. “Math or Fact-Based” (MFB) courses. WB courses, which tend to be subjective in nature, include discipline areas such as English, history, psychology… . MFB courses, which emphasize calculation and/or factual recall, have a tendency to be highly objective in nature, and include discipline areas such as math, science, business, computers, medical technology… . While there are certainly significant areas of overlap in how different assessment instruments are administered in these two categories, most math and many science courses, for instance, tend to focus on calculation and fact-based assessment instruments (such as mid-term and final exams) and most English and history courses, for example, tend to focus on writing-based assessment instruments (such as written assignments and term papers). Based on this distinction, the notion that pedagogical mechanisms (apart from proctored assessments) are sufficient to ensure academic integrity in online MFB courses is questioned and challenged. Recommendations are given to advance the use of proctored assessments in online MFB courses through the creation of universal proctoring standards and the expansion of current and new testing center networks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.