2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Marriages, especially first marriages, are often arranged by older family members, although the married partners may have influence on whether those arrangements proceed (Apostolou, 2007). While polyandrous mating systems tend to be rare in mammals generally, including humans, it is occasionally observed among huntergatherers, and typically when there is a shortage of men (Starkweather and Hames, 2012). Affairs also occur, with love triangles (e.g., men competing over a woman) a regular context of competition among foraging societies such as the !Kung and Hadza (Gat, 2006).…”
Section: Hunter-gatherer Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marriages, especially first marriages, are often arranged by older family members, although the married partners may have influence on whether those arrangements proceed (Apostolou, 2007). While polyandrous mating systems tend to be rare in mammals generally, including humans, it is occasionally observed among huntergatherers, and typically when there is a shortage of men (Starkweather and Hames, 2012). Affairs also occur, with love triangles (e.g., men competing over a woman) a regular context of competition among foraging societies such as the !Kung and Hadza (Gat, 2006).…”
Section: Hunter-gatherer Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared paternity implies polyandrous mating and thus is puzzling in light of the aforementioned traits of human males. Recent research has demonstrated that polyandrous arrangements are more common cross-culturally than previously thought (Starkweather and Hames 2012). Thus, we must give serious consideration to the once suspect notion that women can benefit from multiple mating and polyandrous relationships (Hrdy 2000) and that human reproductive strategies are more complex than traditionally conceived by sociobiologists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study agrees and uses the term informal polyandry as enunciated by Starkweather and Hames (2012) who argued that, "Non-classical informal polyandry does not involve marriage or co-residence in the same domicile but necessitates that multiple men were or are simultaneously engaged in sexual relationships with the same woman, and that all men in the relationship have socially institutionalized responsibilities to care for the woman and her children". Starkweather and Hames (2012) do not include marriage and co-residence in their definition of informal polyandry, but, the writer"s elucidation and use of the phrase "informal polyandry" does differ with the way Starkweather and Hames (2012) defined and used it in that, this study includes marriage and co-residence in his explanation of informal polyandry, because some women in Zimbabwe were married and were involved in polyandry mainly for the sake of bearing children and, secondly for the sake of sexual satisfaction for their first husbands had erectile dysfunction.…”
Section: Definitions Of Termsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Jenni (1974) defined polyandry as the concurrent sexual union/bond between one female and cohusbands. Long established traditional polyandry is distinguished by community -wide recollection of a nuptial coupling as legal and co-habitation of co-husbands and wife (Starkweather and Hames, 2012). Polyandry alludes to one woman simultaneously having more than one husband or male sexual partners both or all of them knowing, accepting and approving of the sexual relationship, while, polygyny is a case in which a man concurrently has more than one wife or female sexual partners and every one of them being aware of and accepting the sexual relationship.…”
Section: Definitions Of Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%