The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12126281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Multi-Focus Image Fusion Methods

Abstract: As an important branch in the field of image fusion, the multi-focus image fusion technique can effectively solve the problem of optical lens depth of field, making two or more partially focused images fuse into a fully focused image. In this paper, the methods based on boundary segmentation was put forward as a group of image fusion method. Thus, a novel classification method of image fusion algorithms is proposed: transform domain methods, boundary segmentation methods, deep learning methods, and combination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional MFIF methods are typically categorized into two main groups: transform domain methods and spatial domain methods [33]. Transform domain methods mainly operate the decomposition coefficient after image transformation, encompassing three key fusion stages: image transformation, coefficient after image transformation, and inverse transformation reconstruction [34]. According to the application of the image transform, transform domain methods can be further classified into multi-scale decomposition (MSD)-based methods (e.g., Laplacian pyramid [14,35], discrete wavelet transform [36,37], nonsubsampled contourlet transform [38][39][40], neighbor distance filtering [41,42], empirical mode decomposition [43]), sparse representation (SR)-based methods (orthogonal matching pursuit [44,45]), gradient domain (GD)-based methods (structure tensor [46,47]), methods based on other transform (independent component analysis [48], cartoon-texture decomposition [49]) and methods based on the combination of different transforms (curvelet transform and wallet transform [50]).…”
Section: Traditional Mfif Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional MFIF methods are typically categorized into two main groups: transform domain methods and spatial domain methods [33]. Transform domain methods mainly operate the decomposition coefficient after image transformation, encompassing three key fusion stages: image transformation, coefficient after image transformation, and inverse transformation reconstruction [34]. According to the application of the image transform, transform domain methods can be further classified into multi-scale decomposition (MSD)-based methods (e.g., Laplacian pyramid [14,35], discrete wavelet transform [36,37], nonsubsampled contourlet transform [38][39][40], neighbor distance filtering [41,42], empirical mode decomposition [43]), sparse representation (SR)-based methods (orthogonal matching pursuit [44,45]), gradient domain (GD)-based methods (structure tensor [46,47]), methods based on other transform (independent component analysis [48], cartoon-texture decomposition [49]) and methods based on the combination of different transforms (curvelet transform and wallet transform [50]).…”
Section: Traditional Mfif Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shifted and scaled versions of a wavelet can positively impact the resolution in the time or frequency domain according to the selected parameters. The wavelet transform aims to maintain a good resolution in the time and frequency domain, contrary to the Fourier transform [73,74].…”
Section: Wavelet-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDT fusion is a challenging subject given the dissimilar data acquisition environment of uni-modal inspections; there is some work on combining NDT techniques by fusion rules such as generic maximum, minimum or average merging by pixel-wise, principle component analysis (PCA) and wavelets, as well as AI-based approaches [10,[18][19][20][21]. In this study, we use the maximum combination rule, given in equations ( 1), as a simple yet effective synergistic approach to retrieve defect edges.…”
Section: Fig 4 Flow Diagram Of the Proposed Decision-level Fusion App...mentioning
confidence: 99%