1996
DOI: 10.2307/1403425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Methods for Analyzing Clustered Binary Response Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
156
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[84][85][86] For objective 1 (baseline demographics and previous insurance experiences by race/ethnicity), we performed bivariate analyses to describe sociodemographic characteristics and previous insurance experiences by race/ethnicity.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[84][85][86] For objective 1 (baseline demographics and previous insurance experiences by race/ethnicity), we performed bivariate analyses to describe sociodemographic characteristics and previous insurance experiences by race/ethnicity.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84,85,87 For objective 3 (determining whether racial/ethnic disparities were explained by socioeconomic/demographic or health system factors), we used generalized linear mixed models to accommodate nested survey sampling and repeated observations for each child (measures before and again during enrollment). We included known sociodemographic and health system factors as covariates and examined the differential effects of SCHIP over time by racial/ethnic group with an interaction term (racial/ ethnic group ϫ time).…”
Section: E698mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimations are carried out with the software package Stata, release 8. 10 An overview of the models and their estimators can be found in Pendergast et al (1996) or Hosmer and Lemeshow (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can be easily adapted for binary outcomes. A more comprehensive review of methods for analysing clustered binary data is presented by Pendergast et al (1996) and Aerts et al (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%