13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1975
DOI: 10.2514/6.1975-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of methods for exhaust-nozzle flow analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) and (2) can be reduced to the nondimensional equation -(</> x +F) (</> r ) (2<t> xr +F r ) + (c 2 /r) (<t> r ) =0 (5) where By differentiating Eq. (3) with respect to r and Eq.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and (2) can be reduced to the nondimensional equation -(</> x +F) (</> r ) (2<t> xr +F r ) + (c 2 /r) (<t> r ) =0 (5) where By differentiating Eq. (3) with respect to r and Eq.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Brown and HamiltJr [15] and Klopfer and Holt [29], another objection to these methods is the potentially poorly posed nature of the problem resulting from the specification of the velocity along the centerline in the subsonic region. When the governing equations are solved numerically, this specification is known to have a destabilizing effect on the computations (Hadamard instability).…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a later publication [75], an example was calculated for the flow in a two-dimensional nozzle with a hyperbolic wall contour. Interestingly, when this method was programmed on a digital computer convergence problems were encountered [15]. Twenty-five years I.…”
Section: I-mentioning
confidence: 99%