2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of medical examiner death certification of vignettes on death in epilepsy: Gaps in identifying SUDEP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that it is often difficult to distinguish drowning deaths in SUDEP based on postmortem findings. Studies have shown that the incidence of SUDEP is probably underestimated because of the underrecognition by medical examiners, coroners, and physicians and because of misclassification of the cause of death . There are many reasons for this underestimate, but some may include attributing death to another cause based on minor autopsy findings (eg, mild atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease), toxicology results (eg, positive screen for opiates in a decedent with chronic opioid use and drug overdose), and death scene findings (eg, death in an empty bathtub and drowning).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that it is often difficult to distinguish drowning deaths in SUDEP based on postmortem findings. Studies have shown that the incidence of SUDEP is probably underestimated because of the underrecognition by medical examiners, coroners, and physicians and because of misclassification of the cause of death . There are many reasons for this underestimate, but some may include attributing death to another cause based on minor autopsy findings (eg, mild atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease), toxicology results (eg, positive screen for opiates in a decedent with chronic opioid use and drug overdose), and death scene findings (eg, death in an empty bathtub and drowning).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the incidence of SUDEP is probably underestimated because of the underrecognition by medical examiners, coroners, and physicians and because of misclassification of the cause of death. [27][28][29] There are many reasons for this underestimate, but some may include attributing death to another cause based on minor autopsy findings (eg, mild atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease), toxicology results (eg, positive screen for opiates in a decedent with chronic opioid use and drug overdose), and death scene findings (eg, death in an empty bathtub and drowning). As both drowning and SUDEP are pathological diagnoses of exclusion, it is understandable that a death could be erroneously attributed to drowning based on F I G U R E 2 Distribution of combined lung weights of the cases in the three groups.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, seizure-related death may be inaccurately or simply undercoded. 32,33 Therefore, we made the a priori decision to expand the definition to include the CALIBER codes for sudden death and ICD-9/10 codes for unknown/unspecified death (Appendix S1). This was predicated on the fact that a cardiovascular etiology is often the default assumed cause of death in otherwise healthy people with epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators with the same data reach different conclusions based on their location, training, and preferences. 19 , 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%