A Survey of Liver Cancer Specialists’ Views on the National Liver Cancer Screening Program in Korea

et al. 2023

JLC

Background/Aim: Abdominal ultrasonography (USG) is recommended as a surveillance test for high-risk groups for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to analyze the current status of the national cancer surveillance program for HCC in South Korea and investigate the effects of patient-, physician-, and machine-related factors on HCC detection sensitivity.Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study collected surveillance USG data from the high-risk group for HCC (liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or C >40 years of age) at eight South Korean tertiary hospitals in 2017.Results: In 2017, 45 experienced hepatologists or radiologists performed 8,512 USG examinations. The physicians had a mean 15.0±8.3 years of experience; more hepatologists (61.4%) than radiologists (38.6%) participated. Each USG scan took a mean 12.2±3.4 minutes. The HCC detection rate by surveillance USG was 0.3% (n=23). Over 27 months of follow-up, an additional 135 patients (0.7%) developed new HCC. The patients were classified into three groups based on timing of HCC diagnosis since the 1st surveillance USG, and no significant intergroup difference in HCC characteristics was noted. HCC detection was significantly associated with patient-related factors, such as old age and advanced fibrosis, but not with physician- or machine-related factors.Conclusions: This is the first study of the current status of USG as a surveillance method for HCC at tertiary hospitals in South Korea. It is necessary to develop quality indicators and quality assessment procedures for USG to improve the detection rate of HCC.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“… 11 In South Korea, an early cancer screening program was implemented for high-risk groups for HCC in 2003; however, few studies have focused on the specific procedures of USG examinations in clinical practice. 12 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current status of ultrasonography in national cancer surveillance program for hepatocellular carcinoma in South Korea: a large-scale multicenter study

Yoo¹,

Kim²,

et al. 2023

JLC

“…The Korean NHIS provides an abdominal sonography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) test free of charge twice a year as a separate program for patients with chronic liver disease (viral hepatitis B and C and cirrhosis) [ 16 ]. Hence, patients with known chronic liver disease rarely choose MREs at their own expense.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting the Target Population for Screening of Hepatic Fibrosis in Primary Care Centers in Korea

Park

Yoon

et al. 2022

JCM

Screening strategies for hepatic fibrosis are heavily focused on patients with fatty liver on sonography in primary care centers. This study aimed to investigate the target population for screening significant hepatic fibrosis in primary care centers. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study used data from 13 nationwide centers. A total of 5111 subjects who underwent both abdominal sonography and magnetic resonance elastography as part of their health check-up were included. Subjects with viral hepatitis and/or a history of significant alcohol consumption were excluded. Significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was defined as ≥3.0 kPa and ≥3.6 kPa in the MRE test, respectively. The prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was 7.3% and 1.9%, respectively. Among the subjects with significant hepatic fibrosis, 41.3% did not have fatty liver. Hepatic fibrosis burden increased according to the number of metabolic risk abnormalities. Nearly 70% of subjects with significant hepatic fibrosis also had two or more metabolic risk abnormalities and/or diabetes. However, the prevalence of fibrosis did not differ between the groups with and without fatty liver. The presence of two or more metabolic risk abnormalities was an independent risk factor for significant hepatic fibrosis regardless of the fatty liver. Therefore, in the setting of primary care centers, screening for hepatic fibrosis would better be extended to subjects with metabolically unhealthy status beyond those with fatty liver.

“…In Korea, patients with chronic liver disease are managed using a separate program. The NHIS provides an abdominal ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) test free of charge twice a year as a separate program for patients with chronic liver disease (viral hepatitis B and C, and cirrhosis) [ 8 ]. Hence, patients with known chronic liver disease rarely choose MRE at their own expense.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fibrosis Burden of Missed and Added Populations According to the New Definition of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver

Park

Yoon

et al. 2021

JCM

Recently, the classification of fatty liver and the definition for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been challenged. Herein, we aim to evaluate the burden of hepatic fibrosis in the missed and added populations following the proposal of the new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver (MAFLD) in a health check-up cohort. A total of 6775 subjects underwent both magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and an abdominal ultrasound at 13 nationwide health check-up centers in Korea. Significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was defined as ≥3.0 kPa and ≥3.6 kPa in the MRE test, respectively. The prevalence of sonographic fatty liver (FL) was 47.4%. Among the subjects with sonographic FL, 77.3% and 94% are compatible with NAFLD and with the new MAFLD definitions, respectively. Moreover, 72% of FL cases belong to both the NAFLD and MAFLD definitions, whereas 1.4% is compatible with neither. The population compatible with the MAFLD definition has the following coexisting liver diseases: alcohol-related (71.9%), hepatitis B (23.9%), hepatitis C (0.4%), and both alcohol and viral hepatitis (2.8%). The prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis is considerable in the MAFLD-only group. However, the prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis is similar in the NAFLD-only group, and neither the NAFLD nor MAFLD group compared to healthy controls. The added population (MAFLD-only group), according to the new MAFLD definition, has a higher metabolic and fibrosis burden when compared to those in the missed population (NAFLD-only group).