Mathematical Programming 1973
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-358350-5.50007-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Integer Programming Emphasizing Computation and Relations among Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

1975
1975
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A further discussion of application areas for (ILP) may be found in Taha (1975) or Garfinkel and Nemhauser (1972).…”
Section: (Ilp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further discussion of application areas for (ILP) may be found in Taha (1975) or Garfinkel and Nemhauser (1972).…”
Section: (Ilp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal, however, is to eliminate sets of inferior expansion plans using bounds determined from a limited enumeration. The general properties of branch-and-bound techniques are described by Garfinkel and Nemhauser (1972), Lawler and Wood (1966), and Mitten (1970). Marks and Liebman (1970), Brill and Nakamura (1978), Nakamura and Brill (1979), Ball, Bialas, and Loucks (1978), Efrovmson and Ray (1966), and Morin (1970) propose branch-and-bound methods for selection of the optimal combination of discrete capacity-expansion alternatives.…”
Section: Least Costly Expansion Plan Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous avons montré dans [1] (1,2,3,6,7,10), (1,4,5,6,8,11), (2,5,7,8,9,12), (3,4,9,10,11,12), (5,6,7,10,11,12)(1,2,3,4,8,9), par exemple, correspond à la contrainte x A + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 + x 8 + x 9 -1.…”
Section: Graphe Associé Au Problème De Partitionnementunclassified
“…Le nombre de variables susceptibles d'être fixées à 0 est ainsi augmenté (des réductions différentes sont obtenues en modifiant l'ordre dans lequel on choisit les contraintes). minimiser z = 18 x t + 22 x 2 +14 x 3 + 36 x 4 +17 x 5 +14 x 6 + 8x 7 + 24x 8 + 14x 9 + 7x 10 , sous les contraintes (3,5), (4,5,6), (2,4,8,9), (3,4,8,10), (1,2,7,9), (1,2,4,6, 8).…”
Section: Améliorations Possibles De La Méthodeunclassified