Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1145/1978802.1978814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of hard real-time scheduling for multiprocessor systems

Abstract: ________________________________________________________________________This survey covers hard real-time scheduling algorithms and schedulability analysis techniques for homogeneous multiprocessor systems. It reviews the key results in this field from its origins in the late 1960's to the latest research published in late 2009. The survey outlines fundamental results about multiprocessor realtime scheduling that hold independent of the scheduling algorithms employed. It provides a taxonomy of the different sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
496
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 745 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
496
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that our strictly periodic scheduling approach yields the maximum achievable throughput for a class of applications called matched I/O rates applications which represents the majority of streaming applications. Applying our approach to matched I/O rates applications enables using a plethora of schedulability tests developed in the real-time scheduling theory [7] to easily determine the minimum number of processors needed to schedule a set of applications using a certain algorithm to provide the maximum achievable throughput. This can be of great use for embedded systems designers during the Design Space Exploration (DSE) phase.…”
Section: Contributions Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Upon empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that our strictly periodic scheduling approach yields the maximum achievable throughput for a class of applications called matched I/O rates applications which represents the majority of streaming applications. Applying our approach to matched I/O rates applications enables using a plethora of schedulability tests developed in the real-time scheduling theory [7] to easily determine the minimum number of processors needed to schedule a set of applications using a certain algorithm to provide the maximum achievable throughput. This can be of great use for embedded systems designers during the Design Space Exploration (DSE) phase.…”
Section: Contributions Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these solutions either use simple MoCs such as SDF/PGM graphs or use TimeDivision Multiplexing (TDM)/Round-Robin (RR) scheduling combined with heuristics. Several algorithms from the hard-real-time multiprocessor scheduling theory [7] can perform fast admission and scheduling decisions for incoming applications while providing hard-real-time services. Moreover, these algorithms provide temporal isolation which is the ability to dynamically start/stop applications without affecting other already running applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global, hybrid scheduling algorithm and various approaches for sharing and usage in real time scheduling are discussed in [10]. To make decisions better Big Data need to convert the data to an interactive format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of scheduling periodic task systems on multiprocessors was originally studied in [14]. Recent studies provide a better understanding of this scheduling problem and provide the first solutions, e.g., [3] presents a categorization of real-time multiprocessor scheduling problems and [7] an up-to-date state of the art. To the best of our knowledge, a single work [1] provides exact schedulability test for the global scheduling of periodic systems on multiprocessors (except two past conference papers we have already published [4,5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%