2020
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.12367508
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Fast Recovery Mechanisms in the Data Plane

Abstract: In order to meet their stringent dependability requirements, most modern communication networks support fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane. While reactions to failures in the data plane can be significantly faster compared to control plane mechanisms, implementing fast recovery in the data plane is challenging, and has recently received much attention in the literature. This survey presents a systematic, tutorial-like overview of packet-based fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane, focusing on conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resilient routing has been widely studied [29], especially for fast recovery and reroute mechanisms [11]. We next focus on 1) local fast reroute (FRR) mechanisms, which covers statically pre-installed failover rules, and 2) non-local recovery mechanisms by means of (control/data plane) convergence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resilient routing has been widely studied [29], especially for fast recovery and reroute mechanisms [11]. We next focus on 1) local fast reroute (FRR) mechanisms, which covers statically pre-installed failover rules, and 2) non-local recovery mechanisms by means of (control/data plane) convergence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unexpected failures (link/switch) are inevitable and happen regularly requiring a rapid action to ensure seamless connectivity without compromising on performance. A plethora of In-network Fast Reroute (FRR) approaches [11,29] have been developed entirely in the data plane to address such a problem. However, these approaches are slow, incur loops, trigger packet loss when routes become unavailable, to reroute traffic via a sub-optimal path [36] which may be shared by other traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilient routing has been widely studied [30], especially for fast recovery and reroute mechanisms [11]. We next focus on 1) local fast reroute (FRR) mechanisms, which covers statically pre-installed failover rules, and 2) non-local recovery mechanisms by means of (control/data plane) convergence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unexpected failures (link/switch) are inevitable and happen regularly requiring a rapid action to ensure seamless connectivity without compromising on performance. A plethora of In-network Fast Reroute (FRR) approaches [11,30] have been developed entirely in the data plane to address such a problem. However, these approaches are slow, incur loops, trigger packet loss when routes become unavailable, to reroute traffic via a sub-optimal path [37] which may be shared by other traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet their stringent availability requirements, most modern communication networks hence feature local fast rerouting algorithms in the data plane which typically operates at timescales several orders of magnitude shorter than the control plane [11], [12]: since rerouting decisions are local, failure recovery can in principle occur at the speed of packet forwarding. At the heart of such fast-reroute (FRR) mechanisms [13] lies the idea of pre-computing alternative paths at any node towards any destination. When a node locally detects a failed link or port, it can autonomously remove the corresponding entries from the forwarding table and continue using the remaining next hops for forwarding packets: a fast local reaction [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%