1992
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-55610-9_180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of equivalence notions for net based systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When applied in the context of model refinement and adaptation, the multitude of equivalence criteria from the linear time -branching time spectrum [35,5] has three major drawbacks. First and foremost, these notions yield a true or false answer, which has been criticised in [36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied in the context of model refinement and adaptation, the multitude of equivalence criteria from the linear time -branching time spectrum [35,5] has three major drawbacks. First and foremost, these notions yield a true or false answer, which has been criticised in [36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not many net-based equivalence notions that are based on the observation of both actions and states [7]. The interface equivalence in [10] belongs to this class.…”
Section: The Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [7] is a good survey for the simulation relations between net-based systems. To define subtyping relations from behavior simulation relations, the main decisions include (1) the observation of actions [3][4], or states [1], or both; (2) expressive or pragmatic; (3) action blocking, or action hiding, or hybrid [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solves the open problem of providing a process calculus representing finite P/T Petri nets, and opens interesting possibilities of cross-fertilization between the areas of Petri nets and process calculi. In particular, it is now possible, on the one hand, (i) to define any (statically reduced) finite P/T net compositionally and (ii) to study algebraic laws for net-based behavioral equivalences (such as net isomorphism) over such a class of systems; on the other hand, it is now possible (iii) to reuse all the techniques and decidability results available for finite P/T nets [12] also for this fragment of multi-CCS, as well as (iv) to continue the study of non-interleaving semantics, typical of Petri nets (e.g., [11,27,29]), also for process algebras (initiated in [8,28]), in particular for finite-net multi-CCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%