A survey of engagement and competence levels in interventions and activities in a community mental health workforce in England

Abstract

BackgroundNational Health Service (NHS) mental health workforce configuration is at the heart of successful delivery, and providers are advised to produce professional development strategies. Recent policy changes in England have sharpened the focus on competency based role development. We determined levels of intervention activities, engagement and competence and their influencing factors in a community-setting mental health workforce.MethodsUsing a modified questionnaire based on the Yorkshire Care Pathways Model we investigated 153 mental health staff working in Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust. A median score of competence was computed across 10 cluster activities. Low engagement and competence levels were examined in a logistic regression model.ResultsIn 220 activities, Monitoring risk was the highest rate of engagement (97.6%) and Group psychological therapy/Art/Drama therapy was the lowest engagement (3.6%). The median competence level based on all activities was 3.95 (proficient). There were significant differences in the competence level among professional groups; non-qualified support group (3.00 for competent), Counsellor/Psychologist/Therapist (3.38), Occupational therapists (3.76), Nurses (4.01), Medical staff (4.05), Social workers (4.25) and Psychologists (4.62 for proficient/expert). These levels varied with activity clusters; the lowest level was for Counsellor/Psychologist/Therapist in the accommodation activity (1.44 novice/advance beginner) and the highest for Occupational therapists in personal activity (4.94 expert). In a multivariate analysis, low competence was significantly related to non-qualified community support professions, late time of obtaining first qualification, more frequencies of clinical training, and training of cognitive behavioural therapy. The associations were similar in the analysis for 10 activity clusters respectively.ConclusionsThere was a reasonable competence level in the community-setting mental health workforce, but competence varied with professional groups and cluster activities. New staff and other non-qualified support professions need to receive efficient training, and the training content is more important than frequency to increase level of competence.

Mental health social work in multidisciplinary community teams: An analysis of a national service user survey

“…Other interventions targeted social functioning with the aim of improving engagement in the community and enabling individuals to enter meaningful vocations (Pahwa et al., 2016; Ramon, 2010; Stromwall & Hurdle, 2003). Social workers used psychological interventions (Davis & Jung, 2012), including counselling (Beresford, 2007; Lang et al., 2011; Peck & Norman, 1999), psycho-education around medication effectiveness and side effects (Davies, 2012; Pahwa et al., 2016) and emotional support to individuals in crisis (Marshall et al., 1995; Raiff & Shore, 1993).…”

Japanese Outreach Model Project for patients who have difficulty maintaining contact with mental health services: Comparison of care between higher‐functioning and lower‐functioning groups

“…A community‐based mental health workforce study in the UK documented the most common support activities as follows: monitoring activities, assessment activities, role support activities, and informal counseling (Lang et al , ). This study's care category of “medical support for psychiatric symptoms” included monitoring and assessment activities.…”

Factors Affecting the Competence of Nursing Assistants in Taiwan Long-Term Care Institutions

“…Low wages, lack of good benefits, heavy workload, and lack of promotion channels are all restrictions on the personal and professional development of NAs [ 6 ]. In addition, the care competence of NAs is highly correlated with LTC quality [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”