2018
DOI: 10.1136/vr.104986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of dairy cow farmers in the United Kingdom: knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding antimicrobial use and resistance

Abstract: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the most pressing challenges facing humanity. This survey of dairy cow farmers (n=372) was conducted to explore knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding veterinary medicine use and to identify farmer-led solutions to reducing, replacing and refining antimicrobial use. Antimicrobials were the most commonly reported veterinary medicines used. Twenty-two per cent of the antibiotics used by dairy farmers contained a highest priority critically important active ingredie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
61
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(39 reference statements)
9
61
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, this limits the power of our study and calls for caution before extrapolating these results to the UK-wide dairy industry. Response rates in our survey were slightly below those typically obtained with this type of surveys [10-15%; www.surveygyzmo.com; (12)]. Higher response rates have been reported for postal or interview-based dairy farmer surveys (13,14), however, online surveys such as ours have distinct advantages, in that they allow distribution of questionnaires to wide target population(s) as well as facilitate reliable processing and analyses of response data, they provide anonymity to participants, and they avoid interviewer bias, among other benefits.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Altogether, this limits the power of our study and calls for caution before extrapolating these results to the UK-wide dairy industry. Response rates in our survey were slightly below those typically obtained with this type of surveys [10-15%; www.surveygyzmo.com; (12)]. Higher response rates have been reported for postal or interview-based dairy farmer surveys (13,14), however, online surveys such as ours have distinct advantages, in that they allow distribution of questionnaires to wide target population(s) as well as facilitate reliable processing and analyses of response data, they provide anonymity to participants, and they avoid interviewer bias, among other benefits.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…AMR and AMU issues have been largely debated in the recent decades. In the European context, several studies investigated the opinions, knowledge and perceptions regarding AMR in different populations, from junior doctors (Pulcini et al 2011), to dairy cow farmers (Higham et al 2018), farmers (Visschers et al 2015(Visschers et al , 2016Di Martino et al 2019), and the general public (Andr e et al 2010). Additionally, the veterinarians' points of view and prescribing behaviour were investigated in the European context (Speksnijder et al 2015;McDougall et al 2017;Van Cleven et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in so-called dry cow therapy, an antibacterial preparation inserted into a cow’s udder between lactations to prevent against mastitis. 15 A survey of dairy farms in England and Wales in 2012 revealed that the fourth generation cephalosporin (4GC) cefquinome (another HP-CIA) was the most used dry cow therapy treatment 16 ; in 2017, however, only 5.3% of total dry cow therapy active ingredients were HP-CIAs. Indeed, there has been a significant decline in the use of HP-CIAs on dairy farms in the UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%