2014 First International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications Science and Technology 2014
DOI: 10.1109/infocommst.2014.6992296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of clustering protocols for MANET with weighted metric for cluster head selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our solution aims to provide a successful P2P deployment on hierarchical MANETs by adapting an efficient routing mechanism for MANETs having similar configuration characteristics as described above. Clustering schemes [53] such as HCS [54] or cluster head selection mechanisms [53] (e.g. [55] which describes a mechanism for cluster head selection and rotation in WSNs (Wireless Sensor Networks), or [56] which describes another approach to select cluster heads in CCN (Content Centric Networking) to maximize the information dissemination across nodes) are not part of the scope of our solution.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our solution aims to provide a successful P2P deployment on hierarchical MANETs by adapting an efficient routing mechanism for MANETs having similar configuration characteristics as described above. Clustering schemes [53] such as HCS [54] or cluster head selection mechanisms [53] (e.g. [55] which describes a mechanism for cluster head selection and rotation in WSNs (Wireless Sensor Networks), or [56] which describes another approach to select cluster heads in CCN (Content Centric Networking) to maximize the information dissemination across nodes) are not part of the scope of our solution.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of non-stable CH will result in overall poor connectivity hence having low performance in network reliability and resilience. [34,53,62].…”
Section: Route Mismatch Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%