2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-015-1135-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of boreal Entoloma with emphasis on the subgenus Rhodopolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DNA analyses of Favre's type specimens are rare and have only been used in a few studies. Altogether, the DNA sequences of eight type specimens (e.g., Cortinarius, Entoloma, Hebeloma , and Inocybe species) have been included recently in mycological surveys and phylogenetic analyses by Cripps et al ( 2010 ), Kokkonen and Vauras ( 2012 ), Kokkonen ( 2015 ), Eberhardt et al ( 2015 ), Liimatainen et al ( 2015 ), and Garnica et al ( 2016 ) (Table 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DNA analyses of Favre's type specimens are rare and have only been used in a few studies. Altogether, the DNA sequences of eight type specimens (e.g., Cortinarius, Entoloma, Hebeloma , and Inocybe species) have been included recently in mycological surveys and phylogenetic analyses by Cripps et al ( 2010 ), Kokkonen and Vauras ( 2012 ), Kokkonen ( 2015 ), Eberhardt et al ( 2015 ), Liimatainen et al ( 2015 ), and Garnica et al ( 2016 ) (Table 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. When blasting sequences for Entoloma, for example, one should be aware that, presently (late 2018), some 55 type sequences generated by Kokkonen (2015) are not yet visible in normal BLAST as part of the RefSeq Targeted Loci (RTL) database, but they are already visible when performing BLAST limited to 'sequences from type'. Therefore, there seems to be a considerable time of lapse between deposition of clearly annotated type sequences and their being prefixed as part of the RefSeq Targeted Loci (RTL) database.…”
Section: Poor Sequence Coverage Of Fungal Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1872, MB advocates the use of E. rhodopolium f. nidorosum (Fr.) Noordeloos 1989 as current name, while IF accepts E. nidorosum as the current name, being considered a distinct species following Kokkonen (2015). The latter paper neotypified E. rhodopolium with a sequenced specimen from Sweden, as both species are genetically sufficiently different to be accepted as separate species.…”
Section: The Rapidly Growing Challenge Of Updating Taxonomic Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it is identical to E. rhodopolium in Europe and North America remain unclear. In fact, the ITS sequence of E. rhodopolium Tottori Er-1 is distinct from that of true E. rhodopolium that Kokkonen reported as a neotype 13 . Therefore, a molecular phylogenetic study is needed to classify Japanese E. rhodopolium and compare European and North American species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Noordel. ex Kokkonen 13 , are morphologically diverse and abundant in Japan. However, the phylogenetic study has not yet been reported, although only E. rhodopolium Tottori Er-1 (Accession number in NCBI, AB301602) is registered as E. rhodopolium .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%