2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of autonomous self-reconfiguration methods for robot-based programmable matter

Abstract: While researchers envision exciting applications for metamorphic systems like programmable matter, current solutions to the shape formation problem are still a long way from meeting their requirements. To dive deeper into this issue, we propose an extensive survey of the current state of the art of selfreconfiguration algorithms and underlying models in modular robotic and self-organizing particle systems. We identify three approaches for solving this problem and we compare the different solutions using a syno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common solution known is to use a huge number of small robots comparable to the cells that compose our body. This comparison gave its name to this solution: Amoebots [13,21,32]. Modular robotics are robots designed with parts that can be reconfigured to accept different functions [6].…”
Section: Modular Robotics and Programmable Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common solution known is to use a huge number of small robots comparable to the cells that compose our body. This comparison gave its name to this solution: Amoebots [13,21,32]. Modular robotics are robots designed with parts that can be reconfigured to accept different functions [6].…”
Section: Modular Robotics and Programmable Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, identifying bases of comparison for evaluating this work in regard to other assembly or self-reconfiguration solutions is arduous and the resulting findings might be inconclusive. As a matter of fact, this a much deeper problem in this line of work, as traditional (i.e., shape to shape) self-reconfiguration works are already afflicted by this evaluation conundrum, due to the variance in robotic models, capabilities, and modes of motion (Thalamy et al, 2019b;Ahmadzadeh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While self-assembly is usually unconcerned with the actual dispatch of the modular robotic modules to their respective destination inside the shape, self-reconfiguration consider this extra step, and aims to transform an initial configuration of such interconnected modules into a goal configuration, through the motion of its components. This has been extensively studied in lattice-based modular robots [14] using both stochastic [21,5] and deterministic approaches [11,7], and was shown to be an NP-complete problem in [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%