2021
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2020.3035315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey and Future Directions on Clustering: From WSNs to IoT and Modern Networking Paradigms

Abstract: Many Internet of Things (IoT) networks are created as an overlay over traditional ad-hoc networks such as Zigbee. Moreover, IoT networks can resemble ad-hoc networks over networks that support device-to-device (D2D) communication, e.g., D2D-enabled cellular networks and WiFi-Direct. In these ad-hoc types of IoT networks, efficient topology management is a crucial requirement, and in particular in massive scale deployments. Traditionally, clustering has been recognized as a common approach for topology manageme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 312 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These nodes are resource-constrained and cannot take the burden of detecting a complex event. They are also clustered according to their deployed geographical region [34]. Figure 2 illustrates the clustered network model where Fog nodes constitute the middle layer (fog layer) of the network structure.…”
Section: B Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nodes are resource-constrained and cannot take the burden of detecting a complex event. They are also clustered according to their deployed geographical region [34]. Figure 2 illustrates the clustered network model where Fog nodes constitute the middle layer (fog layer) of the network structure.…”
Section: B Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is niche factor that decide the faithful operation of the WSNs and IoT's integration. It is utter most important to keep an eye on the topology change of WSNs [6][7][8].…”
Section: Addressingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), the requirements of mobility, collaboration and low power consumption are put forward for monitoring devices. Therefore, simply introducing fixed-position sensors/cameras to deploy traditional wireless sensor networks (WSN) [1,2] or Internet of things (IoT) [3,4] is difficult to meet the mobility needs [5][6][7][8], so it is necessary to implement the mobile surveillance over gazing lands and livestock in ethnic areas. On the one hand, it requires that the wireless communication mechanism used by mobile monitoring devices should have good robustness, and be able to adapt to bad communication conditions; On the other hand, considering the limited computing power and functions on the devices in the mobile wireless environment, mobile monitoring devices are also required to have the ability to cooperate with each other in more complex surveillance tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%