2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2208.00986
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surprising abundance of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 5 in the first data from JWST CEERS

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find the number density of our sample, defined as the number of galaxies that fit our selection criteria at 𝑧 ∼ 4.2 divided by the effective volume of the TNG300 simulated box, to be 𝑛 = 1.32 × 10 −5 Mpc −3 . This closely resembles the observational number densities calculated by Carnall et al (2022) reflecting massive quiescent galaxies located by JWST at 3 < 𝑧 < 5, and by Schreiber et al (2018) in their study of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 identified in the ZFOURGE and 3DHST catalogues (Skelton et al 2014;Straatman et al 2016). The authors of Schreiber et al (2018) report a number density of 2.0 ± 0.3 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 for a spectroscopic sample of quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 , and the number density of quiescent galaxies in Carnall et al (2022)'s robust sub-sample at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 is found to be 6.3 +3.8 −2.5 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 .…”
Section: Results and Discussion: The First Quiescent Central Galaxies...supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find the number density of our sample, defined as the number of galaxies that fit our selection criteria at 𝑧 ∼ 4.2 divided by the effective volume of the TNG300 simulated box, to be 𝑛 = 1.32 × 10 −5 Mpc −3 . This closely resembles the observational number densities calculated by Carnall et al (2022) reflecting massive quiescent galaxies located by JWST at 3 < 𝑧 < 5, and by Schreiber et al (2018) in their study of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 identified in the ZFOURGE and 3DHST catalogues (Skelton et al 2014;Straatman et al 2016). The authors of Schreiber et al (2018) report a number density of 2.0 ± 0.3 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 for a spectroscopic sample of quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 , and the number density of quiescent galaxies in Carnall et al (2022)'s robust sub-sample at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 is found to be 6.3 +3.8 −2.5 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 .…”
Section: Results and Discussion: The First Quiescent Central Galaxies...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…This closely resembles the observational number densities calculated by Carnall et al (2022) reflecting massive quiescent galaxies located by JWST at 3 < 𝑧 < 5, and by Schreiber et al (2018) in their study of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 identified in the ZFOURGE and 3DHST catalogues (Skelton et al 2014;Straatman et al 2016). The authors of Schreiber et al (2018) report a number density of 2.0 ± 0.3 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 for a spectroscopic sample of quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 , and the number density of quiescent galaxies in Carnall et al (2022)'s robust sub-sample at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 is found to be 6.3 +3.8 −2.5 × 10 −5 𝑛/Mpc −3 . Valentino et al (2020) show that the number densities of these quiescent galaxies at 3 < 𝑧 < 4 are consistent between simulations and observations.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: The First Quiescent Central Galaxies...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Recently, Carnall et al (2022) reported that the hosts of both AEGIS 525 and AEGIS 532 are quiescent. That study used the time-dependent quiescent selection criteria sSFR < 0.2/t obs , where t obs is the age of the universe at the redshift of the galaxy.…”
Section: Star Formation Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher redshifts (z = 3-5), the discovery of a growing population of massive (M * > 10 11 M e ) galaxies that fully quenched 1-2 Gyr after the Big Bang further necessitates a rapid and efficient quenching mechanism (Schreiber et al 2018;Forrest et al 2020aForrest et al , 2020bCarnall et al 2022;Labbe et al 2022). However, the role that AGN play in this process is still uncertain, with some models finding that AGN feedback is not the leading mechanism shaping the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function at these redshifts (Yung et al 2019a(Yung et al , 2019b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with this configuration, the best solution remains a galaxy around z = 5 and with A V ∼ 5. While passive sources at 3 < z < 5 are already emerging in JWST early observations (Carnall et al 2022b ), the existence of a massive source with log(M * /M ) ∼11.56, dusty and quenched at z = 5 in a small surv e y volume is v ery une xpected. The majority of quiescent galaxies that have spectroscopy and studied individually in detail at z ∼ 2-4 to date do not show evidence of abundant dust content (Valentino et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Top-right)mentioning
confidence: 99%