2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26595-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surface topography analysis of the curling stone curl mechanism

Abstract: The curling motion of the curling stone on ice is well-known: if a small clockwise rotational velocity is imposed to the stone when it is released, in addition to the linear propagation velocity, the stone will curl to the right. A similar curl to the left is obtained by counter-clockwise rotation. This effect is widely used in the game to reach spots behind the already thrown stones, and the rotation also causes the stone to propagate in a more predictable fashion. Here, we report on novel experimental result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From then on, the debate seems to turn slowly into a scientific standstill even though many papers get published. Two follow-up papers of new authors [9] and [11] then neglected this approach and supported the idea of a scratch-based mechanism. However, two papers by the authors of the Pivot-Slide party [10] and [12] claimed to experimentally disprove these new findings.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From then on, the debate seems to turn slowly into a scientific standstill even though many papers get published. Two follow-up papers of new authors [9] and [11] then neglected this approach and supported the idea of a scratch-based mechanism. However, two papers by the authors of the Pivot-Slide party [10] and [12] claimed to experimentally disprove these new findings.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics behind curling stone movement is still not fully described, and new models are being proposed. Recently proposed models include front-back asymmetry models (assuming an asymmetry of friction forces at the front and the back of a running curling stone) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and pivot-slide models (taking that the curling stone pivots around specific points in the ice during its movement) [12,13]. Currently, no model is widely accepted, and scientists' discussions about various models are still ongoing [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper appeared in the form of a self-published, unrefereed preprint on ReseachGate. 2 In recent work by Honkanen et al, 3 scratches have been generated and studied with a view towards supporting the scratch proposal. Scratches made by the front half of the rock (forward and to the right for clockwise rotation) were shown to be in the opposite sense to those generated by the back half (forward and to the left).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%